Teams

R.Ziperski 3.0 55+

2023 Cap Adult 55 & Over · 3.0 Women

6 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-05-04vs V.FleischmannWon 10
W#3 DoublesDEBRA LAUGHERY / Justine Saleeby vs Lavonne Moore / Kathryn Williamson6-2, 6-3
2023-04-20vs C.COUCHLost 02
L#2 DoublesDonna Rutigliano / Amy Propst vs Mary-Jo Caldwell / Suzy Kaelin2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesSara May / DEBRA LAUGHERY vs Pam Weis / Barbara Goff6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2023-04-13vs M.Springfield 55+Won 20
W#1 DoublesDonna Rutigliano / Amy Propst vs Angela Hunter / Hope Tharrington6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesDEBRA LAUGHERY / Chris Lickey vs Patricia Ligon / Rhonda Crutchfield6-4, 6-1
2023-04-06vs K.Serow 55+Won 10
W#3 DoublesDEBRA LAUGHERY / Robyn Ziperski vs Lucine Barker / Kathleen Serow6-1, 7-6
2023-03-30vs K.Serow 55+Lost 01
L#3 DoublesJustine Saleeby / Jennifer Diehl vs Carol Zimmerman / Debra Allen2-6, 1-6
2023-03-23vs W.Sielaty 3.0 55+Lost 02
L#2 DoublesJennifer Diehl / Justine Saleeby vs Julie Shuey / Wendy Sielaty6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesAmy Propst / Robyn Ziperski vs Marie Gelston / Cathy Williams4-6, 6-7
2023-03-16vs D.Williams 55+Lost 01
L#3 DoublesJustine Saleeby / Jennifer Diehl vs Martha Herlihy / Jeannette Congdon6-7, 6-7
2023-03-09vs V.FleischmannSplit 11
L#1 DoublesDonna Rutigliano / DEBRA LAUGHERY vs Judy Colby / Mary Strothmann0-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesSara May / Justine Saleeby vs Sally Sikes / Ellen Werner6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.66 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.99
Karen Wakeford
published
2.68
Jeanne Stallings
published
2.67
Justine Saleeby
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.58
Jennifer Diehl
published
2.55
Amy Propst
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.46
DEBRA LAUGHERY
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

DEBRA LAUGHERY + Justine Saleeby3743% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Karen Wakeford
5W–6L career · no lines in 2023
52%48%<1%
2.99
Jeanne Stallings
4W–6L career · no lines in 2023
9%91%1%
2.68
3
Justine Saleeby
31W–54L career · 5 lines in 2023
9%90%1%
2.67
Jennifer Diehl
1W–6L career · no lines in 2023
26%74%<1%
2.58
3
Amy Propst
25W–70L career · 3 lines in 2023
34%66%<1%
2.55
3
DEBRA LAUGHERY
48W–92L career · type A · 5 lines in 2023
62%38%<1%
2.46

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.