← Teams

MAC-Duong/Leeding

2024 Mixed 18 & Over · 9.0 Mixed

11 players · average NTRP 4.32 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.88 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.46
Annie Duong
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
—
Benjamin Yang
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
—
Shannon Bilstrom
published 4.5
4.10
Nathan Austin
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.04
Christie Post
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.02
Ken Schwerd
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.88
Elise Anderson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
3.87
Darci Keljo
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.81
Doug Post
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.58
Heidi Wilcox
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.18
Kathryn Wilson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
Results8 ties
2023-12-03Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesDarci Keljo / Paul Reber vs Jeremy Morris / Olivia Herzberg6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesNathan Austin / Elise Anderson vs Rudd McGarity / Tracy Gagnon6-7, 6-0, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKen Schwerd / Kathryn Wilson vs Michael Yee / Dongju Won6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2023-12-03Split 1–1
L#1 DoublesDarci Keljo / Paul Reber vs Mary Green-Zwemke / Pannhara Mam6-2, 7-5
W#3 DoublesAnnie Duong / Sergio Toledo vs Phalkun Mam / Megan Soucy6-7, 6-4, 1-0
2023-11-11Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesGreg Masson / Elise Anderson vs WILLIAM EDWARDS / Kirsten Ruchaber7-5, 6-1
L#2 DoublesNathan Austin / Kathryn Wilson vs Brendan Cunningham / Rebecca Redding6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesAnnie Duong / Ken Schwerd vs Kerstin Anderson / Gareth Hosford6-1, 2-6, 1-0
2023-10-28Lost 0–2
L#2 DoublesBenjamin Yang / Annie Duong vs David Rojas / Kaytlynn Kolb6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesSergio Toledo / Kathryn Wilson vs Heidi Affentranger / Simon Waite6-3, 6-3
2023-10-22Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesSergio Toledo / Kathryn Wilson vs Brooke Daugherty / William Leach7-5, 6-2
L#3 DoublesElise Anderson / Greg Masson vs Karen Ohollaren / Jon Griesser6-2, 6-3
2023-10-15Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesDarci Keljo / Connor Leahy vs Cindy Rushall / Matthew Condit7-5, 6-1
W#2 DoublesGreg Masson / Kathryn Wilson vs Arlen Britt / Sarah Kaufman6-3, 6-4
2023-10-13Split 1–1
W#1 DoublesHeidi Wilcox / Marco Pineda vs Asim Hafeez / Nicole Ralston6-1, 6-3
L#3 DoublesSergio Toledo / Elise Anderson vs Kasey Williams / Steve Vanderploeg7-5, 7-5
2023-09-10Split 1–1
W#2 DoublesKathryn Wilson / Sergio Toledo vs Denielle Edlund / Phalkun Mam3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesChristie Post / Doug Post vs Mary Green-Zwemke / Geoffrey Schwind6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4.5
Annie Duong
120W–52L career
0%69%31%
4.46
4.5
Benjamin Yang
67W–54L career
not enough data
—
4.5
Shannon Bilstrom
13W–21L career
not enough data
—
4.5
Nathan Austin
67W–78L career
3%96%0%
4.10
4.5
Christie Post
29W–26L career
9%91%0%
4.04
4
Ken Schwerd
66W–26L career
0%78%22%
4.02
4.5
Elise Anderson
84W–81L career · type A
47%53%0%
3.88
4
Darci Keljo
55W–36L career
0%97%3%
3.87
4
Doug Post
79W–40L career
0%98%1%
3.81
4
Heidi Wilcox
86W–87L career
15%85%0%
3.58
4.5
Kathryn Wilson
32W–26L career
100%0%0%
3.18

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.