Teams

RCW - Scull

2026 Central Penn Ladies Day League · 5.0 Division - Fall

15 players · average NTRP 2.60 / CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-11-12vs Hempfield - Woods KellyWon 10
W#1 DoublesEllie Scull / Ashley Cope vs Kaye Mede / Lynette Huber6-2, 6-1
2025-11-06vs Lanc CC - Shand / ChambersLost 01
L#1 DoublesWenye Deng / Nancy Swank vs Krista Chambers / Tara Kinney3-6, 1-6
2025-10-30vs Hempfield - Woods-KellyWon 20
W#1 DoublesWenye Deng / Ellie Scull vs Lynette Huber / Nancy ONeill6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesErika Rettew / Nancy Swank vs Sharon Downey / Linda Mullen6-0, 5-7, 1-0
2025-10-22vs Bent Creek - Pasic / SouthWon 10
W#1 DoublesEllie Scull / Erika Rettew vs Abby Pasic / Kara Schama6-1, 5-7, 1-0
2025-09-25vs Hershey Skor - RenaudWon 10
W#1 DoublesMary Cepeda / Ellie Scull vs Kelly Renaud / Cynthia Spondello6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2025-09-19vs Bent Creek - Pasic / SouthWon 10
W#2 DoublesErika Rettew / Nancy Swank vs Leah Fox / Jennifer Zuidema7-5, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 5.0 Division - Fall
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Lanc CC - Shand / Chambers08124996
2Bent Creek - Pasic / South0811511100
3RCW - Scull087922159
4Hempfield - Woods Kelly0841225159

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.34 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.03
Ellie Scull
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.58
Ashley Cope
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.56
Wenye Deng
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.50
Ashley Yuskevich
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.49
Nancy Swank
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.36
Erika Rettew
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 2.5
2.28
Mary Cepeda
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 2.5
Agnes Johnson
published 2.5
Amy Loercher
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.20
Emma George
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 2.5
2.14
Tessa Lydic
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.10
Katie Decapria
published
1.99
Jacqui Hershberger
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
1.85
Marsha Doom
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Sharon Lauriello
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ashley Cope + Ashley Yuskevich4159% games+16.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Ellie Scull
15W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%42%58%
3.03
2.5
Ashley Cope
8W–4L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
0%26%74%
2.58
Wenye Deng
12W–14L career · 7 lines in 2026
0%31%69%
2.56
2.5
Ashley Yuskevich
12W–8L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
0%48%52%
2.50
3
Nancy Swank
20W–48L career · type A · 3 lines in 2026
54%46%<1%
2.49
2.5
Erika Rettew
7W–7L career · 8 lines in 2026
0%86%14%
2.36
2.5
Mary Cepeda
30W–51L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%95%5%
2.28
2.5
Agnes Johnson
0W–2L career · type S · no lines in 2026
not enough data
2.5
Amy Loercher
2W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
2.5
Emma George
5W–17L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.20
Tessa Lydic
4W–5L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.14
Katie Decapria
2W–7L career · no lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.10
2.5
Jacqui Hershberger
0W–3L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.99
Marsha Doom
3W–6L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.85
Sharon Lauriello
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.