Teams

Savvy Strikers/Parekh/Menlo Park

2025 Tri-Level 3.0 · 3.5

12 players · average NTRP 3.38 / NO. CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-04-05vs Between the Lines/Blevins/DanvilleLost 12
L#1 DoublesTeri Parekh / Jillian Gee vs Barbara Sullivan / Tricia Jacob2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesPatricia Buck / Eunju Sagurton vs Hannah Kim / Melissa Vincelette3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Grover / Kelly Chen vs Emily Lieginger / Sarah Blevins1-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-04-05vs Baby Got Backhand/Thomas/DanvilleLost 03
L#1 DoublesJillian Gee / Teri Parekh vs Tammy Fox / Maddie Thomas6-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesPatricia Buck / Eunju Sagurton vs Ana Caroline Leon Williams / Clairessa Brown3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesElizabeth Grover / Kelly Chen vs Romeda Arsanjani / Jessica Ford2-6, 3-6
2025-04-04vs Pink Panthers/Singh/AlamoWon 30
W#1 DoublesStephanie King / Liza Hausman vs Gina Chen / Tuesdai Powers6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesSarah Chai / Carole Donnelly vs Rose Spicer / Jill Fissel6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMichelle Dike / Kerry Loftus vs Kristine Kennedy / Chandavone Reeder6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.76
Liza Hausman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.64
Jillian Gee
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.32
Patricia Buck
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.32
Sarah Chai
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.30
Carole Donnelly
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.29
Teri Parekh
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.27
Kerry Loftus
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.23
Amanda Ross
published 3.5
3.18
Eunju Sagurton
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.10
Kelly Chen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.97
Michelle Dike
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.67
Elizabeth Grover
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elizabeth Grover + Kelly Chen3254% gamesnot enough data
Amanda Ross + Kerry Loftus314 matchesnot enough data
Teri Parekh + Jillian Gee033 matchesnot enough data
Carole Donnelly + Sarah Chai213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Liza Hausman
15W–23L career · 1 line in 2025
2%94%3%
3.76
Jillian Gee
26W–46L career · 2 lines in 2025
13%86%<1%
3.64
Patricia Buck
7W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%91%8%
3.32
Sarah Chai
14W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Carole Donnelly
9W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
1%92%7%
3.30
Teri Parekh
51W–79L career · 2 lines in 2025
95%5%<1%
3.29
Kerry Loftus
17W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Amanda Ross
32W–9L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Eunju Sagurton
11W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
8%91%1%
3.18
Kelly Chen
9W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.10
Michelle Dike
5W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
59%41%<1%
2.97
3
Elizabeth Grover
15W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
10%90%1%
2.67

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.