Teams

MILL VALLEY 18AW4.0A

2022 ADULT 18&Over · Women's 4.0

15 players · average NTRP 3.88 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women's 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.57 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.29
Meg Shackleton
published
4.02
Kimberly Boswell
published
Gillian Reilly
published 4
3.75
Vanessa Lyons
published
3.74
Catherine Stern
published 4
3.70
Rachel Aspatore
published
3.59
Maura Kneafsey
published
3.53
Tracy McCulloch
published
3.52
Tina Jennings
published
3.49
Gina Seaborg
published 4
3.46
Gail Dunnett
published 3.5
3.20
Kathleen Craven
published
3.19
Mary McLain
published
2.90
Wendy Crowe
published
Sue Glader
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Maura Kneafsey + Rachel Aspatore134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Meg Shackleton
7W–2L career · no lines in 2022
1%94%5%
4.29
Kimberly Boswell
2W–4L career · no lines in 2022
43%57%<1%
4.02
4
Gillian Reilly
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Vanessa Lyons
7W–4L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Catherine Stern
4W–7L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.74
Rachel Aspatore
4W–10L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.70
Maura Kneafsey
3W–3L career · no lines in 2022
24%76%<1%
3.59
Tracy McCulloch
1W–6L career · no lines in 2022
42%58%<1%
3.53
Tina Jennings
6W–10L career · no lines in 2022
45%55%<1%
3.52
4
Gina Seaborg
1W–10L career · no lines in 2022
54%46%<1%
3.49
3.5
Gail Dunnett
3W–1L career · type A · no lines in 2022
<1%62%38%
3.46
Kathleen Craven
2W–2L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.20
Mary McLain
2W–4L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.19
Wendy Crowe
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
77%23%<1%
2.90
Sue Glader
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.