Teams

Bridgemill (Nina Hutcherson)*

USTA Atlanta Summer - 18 & Over Weekday Women - Low · 4.0 Low (Check Eligibility List)

19 players · average NTRP 3.67 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-07-10vs White Columns (Tiffany Rowell)*Won 32
W#1 DoublesMalory Bateman / Lynne Poirier vs Amy Fahey / Meg Smith7-5, 6-3
W#1 SinglesCecily Rich vs Caroline Slayton6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesDiana Morris / Rose Wildermuth vs Ashley Cheek / Michele Costello6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesSuzanne Hanley / Sandra Woodard vs Jennifer Avery / Sarah Pender6-2, 3-6, 0-6
L#4 DoublesRonel Willemse / Jean Landmesser vs Elizabeth Rhoades / Blane Case2-6, 6-4, 2-6
2025-06-30vs Hembree Park (Carli Bouckaert)*Won 31
W#1 DoublesMalory Bateman / Diana Morris vs Jodi Kastner / Lindsey Engbrecht6-1, 6-0
W#1 SinglesJean Landmesser vs Lisa Harding2-6, 6-1, 7-5
L#2 DoublesAnneliese Wildermuth / Rose Wildermuth vs Lara Morrison / Rebecca Suid6-7, 5-7
W#3 DoublesSuzanne Hanley / Laura Cross vs Marnie Allen / Ann McCarthy7-5, 6-3
W#1 DoublesLynne Poirier / Malory Bateman vs Jenifer Joyce Tubb Harcourt / Jenny Lemoine6-2, 6-3
W#1 SinglesCecily Rich vs Dana Houck6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesSuzanne Hanley / Jean Landmesser vs Merideth Branch / Wendy Henslee6-4, 6-0
L#3 DoublesEmily Ezell / Nina Hutcherson vs Amy Catherwood / Renee Welborn3-6, 6-2, 2-6
W#4 DoublesElaine Eternod / TRICIA ONeill vs Kristin Walsh / Michelle Helms6-3, 6-4
2025-06-12vs Crooked Creek (Teresa Traylor)*Won 32
L#1 DoublesAnneliese Wildermuth / Rose Wildermuth vs Julie Tindle / Holly Adelmann5-7, 6-2, 3-6
L#1 SinglesJean Landmesser vs Regan Medzhibzher6-7, 6-7
W#2 DoublesLaura Cross / Suzanne Hanley vs Elaine Welch / Aarti Murlidhar3-6, 6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesDiana Morris / Cheryl Richard vs Polly Schwartz / Catherine Hanson6-4, 6-2
W#4 DoublesSandra Woodard / Nina Hutcherson vs Lori Ovington / Danielle Rudolph6-2, 6-1
2025-06-06vs Woodmont (Jeanine Blumer)*Won 32
W#1 DoublesMalory Bateman / Cecily Rich vs Jennifer Hanson / Laura O'Kelley6-4, 6-3
W#1 SinglesRose Wildermuth vs Theresa Brown6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesMichelle Jones / Emily Ezell vs Stephanie Merritt / Crystal Meers-Bobo4-6, 6-3, 5-7
W#3 DoublesNina Hutcherson / Laura Cross vs Jeanine Blumer / Linda Johnson1-6, 6-4, 6-4
L#4 DoublesSally Loos / TRICIA ONeill vs Met Flahardy / Angie Smith7-5, 4-6, 1-6
2025-06-05vs Polo Golf & CC (Emily Harris)*Won 32
W#1 DoublesLynne Poirier / Rose Wildermuth vs Erin Burks / Caroline Christiansen7-5, 3-6, 6-4
L#1 SinglesJean Landmesser vs Mary Beth Tallant4-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesNina Hutcherson / Diana Morris vs Blair Bleiman / Holly Leonard5-7, 3-6
W#3 DoublesElaine Eternod / Cheryl Richard vs Betsy Cooper / Marilyn Ball4-6, 6-3, 7-5
W#4 DoublesSally Loos / TRICIA ONeill vs Amelia Kouznetsov / Tracie Longoria6-1, 6-0
W#1 DoublesDiana Morris / Lynne Poirier vs Suzanne Yanders / Tracy Kennedy7-5, 7-6
W#1 SinglesCecily Rich vs Laura White6-4, 7-6
L#2 DoublesMichelle Jones / Ronel Willemse vs Suzette Williams / Shantal Raymer4-6, 6-3, 4-6
W#3 DoublesLaura Cross / Sandra Woodard vs Sarah Warshaw / Lauren Hogan6-0, 6-3
L#4 DoublesEmily Ezell / Linda Goldman vs Julie O'Connor / Lei Guy3-6, 6-3, 5-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Low (Check Eligibility List) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.53 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
Cecily Rich
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.79
Malory Bateman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.77
Lynne Poirier
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.74
Sandra Woodard
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published
3.72
Diana Morris
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.70
Jean Landmesser
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #4 Doubles 20% · published
3.68
Rose Wildermuth
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.66
TRICIA ONeill
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
3.52
Suzanne Hanley
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.44
Anneliese Wildermuth
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.43
Laura Cross
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.41
Ronel Willemse
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.37
Sally Loos
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
3.33
Cheryl Richard
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.28
Nina Hutcherson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 25% · published
3.20
Emily Ezell
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.17
Elaine Eternod
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Linda Goldman
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
Lori Haigwood
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laura Cross + Ronel Willemse2350% games+4.3% vs expected
Cheryl Richard + Jean Landmesser5063% games+2.6% vs expected
Sandra Woodard + Lynne Poirier4350% games−1.9% vs expected
Laura Cross + Elaine Eternod7849% games−2.8% vs expected
Cheryl Richard + Laura Cross3446% games−13.1% vs expected
Sally Loos + TRICIA ONeill2640% games−19.2% vs expected
Malory Bateman + Lynne Poirier6071% gamesnot enough data
TRICIA ONeill + Rose Wildermuth3252% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Cecily Rich
24W–20L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.83
Malory Bateman
44W–29L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%93%5%
3.79
Lynne Poirier
42W–35L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.77
Sandra Woodard
33W–31L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%94%2%
3.74
4
Diana Morris
21W–14L career · 5 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.72
Jean Landmesser
51W–29L career · 5 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
3.70
Rose Wildermuth
71W–70L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%9%91%
3.68
TRICIA ONeill
14W–25L career · 3 lines in 2026
12%88%<1%
3.66
Suzanne Hanley
39W–33L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%43%57%
3.52
3.5
Anneliese Wildermuth
2W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%68%32%
3.44
Laura Cross
32W–36L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
3.43
Ronel Willemse
46W–83L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
3.41
Sally Loos
12W–25L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%84%16%
3.37
3.5
Cheryl Richard
26W–26L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%90%10%
3.33
Nina Hutcherson
15W–23L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Emily Ezell
0W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Elaine Eternod
21W–40L career · 2 lines in 2026
10%90%1%
3.17
Linda Goldman
13W–20L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Lori Haigwood
8W–16L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.