Teams

Hamlin/Kiser

2024 Roanoke Singles · Roanoke Singles 4.5 Women

7 players · average NTRP 4.33 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-11-23vs JonesLost 12
W#1 SinglesJulie McMichael vs Tiffany LaCroix6-0, 7-6
L#2 SinglesMolly McMichael vs Nancy Via0-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesCarolyn Kiser vs Liz Mason-Deese3-6, 7-6, 0-1
2024-11-19vs JonesLost 12
W#1 SinglesHolly Hamlin vs Jen Stewart6-2, 7-6
L#2 SinglesDanielle Marshall vs Nancy Via6-7, 6-7
L#3 SinglesAmy Cullen vs Liz Mason-Deese2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2024-11-13vs JonesSplit 11
W#2 SinglesLaura Capuano vs Liz Mason-Deese6-2, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 SinglesHolly Hamlin vs Nancy Via5-7, 0-6
2024-11-12vs JonesLost 02
L#1 SinglesAmy Cullen vs Liz Mason-Deese0-6, 5-7
L#2 SinglesDanielle Marshall vs Nancy Via3-6, 2-6
2024-11-05vs JonesSplit 11
W#2 SinglesCarolyn Kiser vs Tiffany LaCroix6-0, 6-1
L#3 SinglesAmy Cullen vs Jen Stewart5-7, 2-6
2024-10-27vs JonesWon 20
W#2 SinglesCarolyn Kiser vs Liz Mason-Deese6-1, 6-3
W#3 SinglesJulie McMichael vs Nancy Via6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2024-10-15vs JonesLost 12
L#1 SinglesMolly McMichael vs Liz Mason-Deese2-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesJulie McMichael vs Nancy Via6-7, 3-6
W#3 SinglesCarolyn Kiser vs Jen Stewart7-6, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Roanoke Singles 4.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.87 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.27
Carolyn Kiser
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 4.5
4.19
Laura Capuano
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
4.00
Holly Hamlin
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published
3.88
Danielle Marshall
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 4
3.75
Julie McMichael
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
3.61
Molly McMichael
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.41
Amy Cullen
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Holly Hamlin + Carolyn Kiser4352% games−11.0% vs expected
Danielle Marshall + Carolyn Kiser213 matchesnot enough data
Amy Cullen + Holly Hamlin123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Carolyn Kiser
15W–11L career · 4 lines in 2024
3%92%5%
4.27
Laura Capuano
142W–59L career · 1 line in 2024
8%90%1%
4.19
Holly Hamlin
18W–17L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%50%50%
4.00
4
Danielle Marshall
19W–12L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%80%20%
3.88
Julie McMichael
18W–29L career · 3 lines in 2024
3%93%4%
3.75
Molly McMichael
0W–9L career · 2 lines in 2024
22%78%<1%
3.61
4.5
Amy Cullen
9W–9L career · 3 lines in 2024
>99%<1%<1%
3.41

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.