← Teams

PTC-Bledsoe

2020 Mixed 18 & Over · 6.0 Mixed

10 players · average NTRP 3.4 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.08 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.71
Morgan Towle
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.28
Erin Casey
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
—
Christie Herkert
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.13
Maya Mori
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.11
Jamil Panni
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.06
Wendy Schmidt
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.04
Joshua Lewis
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.99
Jenny Marston
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.75
William Seidl
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.60
Michael McTague
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3
Results8 ties
2019-11-08Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesWilliam Seidl / Erin Casey vs Susan Robblee / Dave Sato6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesLisa Bledsoe / Michael McTague vs Ann Hays / Steven Harrison6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMaya Mori / Jamil Panni vs Cyndi Peck / Stephen Galati6-0, 6-1
2019-11-02Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesWilliam Seidl / Erin Casey vs Paula Morgan / Ty Bettis6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMichael McTague / Wendy Schmidt vs Wendy Vaughn / Todd Jacobson6-4, 7-5
W#3 DoublesJamil Panni / Maya Mori vs Janine Wood / Steven Phillippi6-1, 6-3
2019-10-27Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesMichael McTague / Erin Casey vs Joshua Smith / Leslie Cole7-6, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJamil Panni / Maya Mori vs Paul Ecker / Julia Plowman6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJoshua Lewis / Wendy Schmidt vs Irene Gilbertson / Kevin McMullen6-1, 6-0
2019-10-20Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesWilliam Seidl / Erin Casey vs Nicola Ash / Nick Hooker7-5, 6-4
L#2 DoublesChristie Herkert / Michael McTague vs Ryan Owens / Amy Bucher6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMorgan Towle / Paul Kim vs Erik Bucher / Karin Owens6-4, 6-4
2019-10-05Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesJenny Marston / William Seidl vs Trish Peters / Steve Thunstedt6-4, 4-2
L#2 DoublesMichael McTague / Maya Mori vs Heidi Palena / Robert Palena6-4, 6-1
L#3 DoublesChristie Herkert / Jamil Panni vs Kalynn Belden / John McCarthy6-3, 5-7, 1-0
2019-09-22Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesMichael McTague / Erin Casey vs Heidi Palena / Robert Palena7-5, 6-2
L#2 DoublesLisa Bledsoe / Jamil Panni vs Trish Peters / Jon Peters7-6, 6-3
W#3 DoublesWendy Schmidt / Joshua Lewis vs Karl Kropp / Raquel Rich6-1, 6-0
2019-09-15Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesWilliam Seidl / Christie Herkert vs Amrut Kapare / Robin Walker6-3, 7-6
W#2 DoublesMichael McTague / Maya Mori vs Jialiang Zhang / Rebecca Arguello2-6, 6-0, 1-0
L#3 DoublesPaul Kim / Morgan Towle vs Diviteja Guntamadugu / Erin Canova6-1, 6-3
2019-09-07Split 1–1
W#1 DoublesErin Casey / William Seidl vs Susan Robblee / Hoon Shin6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesLisa Bledsoe / Joshua Lewis vs Kim Tellin / Anup Pandya7-5, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Morgan Towle
59W–54L career
2%98%0%
3.71
3.5
Erin Casey
142W–91L career
0%99%1%
3.28
3.5
Christie Herkert
30W–31L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Maya Mori
86W–77L career
10%90%0%
3.13
3.5
Jamil Panni
82W–59L career
10%90%0%
3.11
3.5
Wendy Schmidt
41W–32L career
26%74%0%
3.06
3
Joshua Lewis
63W–41L career
0%72%28%
3.04
3.5
Jenny Marston
11W–26L career
42%58%0%
2.99
3
William Seidl
58W–56L career
3%96%1%
2.75
3
Michael McTague
50W–87L career
18%82%0%
2.60

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.