Teams

KS/Seitz/40&Over3.5M

2021 KS 40 & Over Adult Outdoor League · 3.5 Men

11 players · average NTRP 4.00 / KANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-05-19vs Eccles - Kossover, TopekaWon 30
W#1 DoublesScott Ritter / Mark Herman vs Edward Mcmurphy / Donald Arnold6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMatt Barker / Mark Bettis vs Walter Trammell / Berry Wanless6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTroy Fay / Juan C Ramirez-Mares vs Rodney Bleich / Mark Underwood6-2, 6-2
2021-05-12vs Eccles - Kossover, TopekaWon 31
W#1 DoublesBen Seitz / Randy Knight vs Don Eccles / Rodney Bleich6-0, 6-1
L#1 SinglesJuan C Ramirez-Mares vs Donald Arnold6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesScott Ritter / Troy Fay vs Edward Mcmurphy / Berry Wanless6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMark Kohls / Matt Barker vs Don Hoffman / Walter Trammell6-0, 6-7, 1-0
2021-05-05vs Eccles - Kossover, TopekaWon 31
W#1 DoublesBen Seitz / Scott Ritter vs Don Eccles / Don Hoffman6-0, 6-3
L#1 SinglesTroy Fay vs Edward Mcmurphy5-7, 6-1, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMark Bettis / Mark Kohls vs Berry Wanless / Charles Bonebrake7-6, 7-5
W#3 DoublesRandy Knight / Juan C Ramirez-Mares vs Donald Arnold / David Thurbon2-6, 6-1, 1-0
2021-04-28vs Eccles - Kossover, TopekaWon 31
W#1 DoublesScott Ritter / Ben Seitz vs Mark Underwood / Walter Trammell6-0, 6-3
L#1 SinglesRandy Knight vs Chris Demas2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesMark Kohls / Matt Barker vs Lewis Lenard / Don Hoffman6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesMark Herman / Brett Klausman vs Charles Bonebrake / David Thurbon6-2, 6-2
2021-04-25vs Eccles - Kossover, TopekaWon 40
W#1 DoublesTroy Fay / Randy Knight vs Edward Mcmurphy / Rodney Bleich6-1, 6-4
W#1 SinglesMark Kohls vs Donald Arnold6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesBen Seitz / Scott Ritter vs Berry Wanless / Lewis Lenard6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMark Herman / Sachin Bharati vs Don Eccles / David Thurbon6-2, 6-2
2021-04-25vs Eccles - Kossover, TopekaWon 31
W#1 DoublesBen Seitz / Mark Herman vs Don Eccles / Lewis Lenard6-2, 6-1
L#1 SinglesSachin Bharati vs Edward Mcmurphy4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesTroy Fay / Randy Knight vs Don Hoffman / Walter Trammell6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesScott Ritter / Juan C Ramirez-Mares vs Berry Wanless / Charles Bonebrake6-3, 7-5
2021-04-17vs Eccles - Kossover, TopekaWon 31
W#1 DoublesScott Ritter / Ben Seitz vs Edward Mcmurphy / Berry Wanless6-2, 6-1
L#1 SinglesJuan C Ramirez-Mares vs Chris Demas1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesMark Herman / Brett Klausman vs Donald Arnold / Don Eccles6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesRandy Knight / Troy Fay vs Don Hoffman / David Thurbon6-0, 6-1
2021-04-17vs Eccles - Kossover, TopekaWon 31
W#1 DoublesScott Ritter / Ben Seitz vs Rodney Bleich / Berry Wanless6-2, 6-1
L#1 SinglesJuan C Ramirez-Mares vs Walter Trammell1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesMark Herman / Brett Klausman vs Edward Mcmurphy / Chris Demas6-1, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRandy Knight / Troy Fay vs Mark Underwood / Donald Arnold6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.50 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.65
Scott Ritter
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.64
Ben Seitz
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 4
3.50
Sachin Bharati
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.21
Juan C Ramirez-Mares
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Brett Klausman
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Mark Bettis
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Mark Herman
published
Mark Kohls
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
Matt Barker
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Randy Knight
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
Troy Fay
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Randy Knight + Troy Fay7269% games+15.4% vs expected
Scott Ritter + Ben Seitz16760% games+10.5% vs expected
Mark Herman + Brett Klausman3347% gamesnot enough data
Scott Ritter + Randy Knight404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Scott Ritter
104W–49L career · 8 lines in 2021
13%87%<1%
3.65
4
Ben Seitz
95W–75L career · 7 lines in 2021
15%85%<1%
3.64
Sachin Bharati
118W–68L career · 2 lines in 2021
<1%49%51%
3.50
Juan C Ramirez-Mares
38W–65L career · 6 lines in 2021
5%94%1%
3.21
Brett Klausman
28W–11L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Mark Bettis
5W–8L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Mark Herman
7W–19L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Mark Kohls
4W–0L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Matt Barker
5W–0L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Randy Knight
64W–52L career · 7 lines in 2021
not enough data
Troy Fay
28W–21L career · 7 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.