Teams

Mission Oaks Rockets

2026 USTA Adult 18 & Over - Ventura · Ventura - Men 3.5

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-06-28vs Mission Oaks FoesLost 13
W#1 DoublesSteven Hanson / Marc Roaquin vs Andre Bati / Longbin Liu6-1, 2-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesMiguel Delgado vs Matthew Shen2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMatthew Maxel / Amal Gangodkar vs Peter DiPasquale / Brian Colon0-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesCabot Richards / Jay Idea vs Michael Agacite / Bryan Stern3-6, 0-6
2026-06-20vs V-LLW Return of the WAC-CuttingLost 04
L#1 DoublesWilliam Schreiber / Miguel Delgado vs Ryan Liljegren / Lucas Chilczuk1-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesCabot Richards vs Kumar Desai5-7, 5-7
L#2 DoublesMatthew Maxel / Christian Brown vs Justin Hasting / MIQUEL FERNANDEZ GOMEZ1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesSteven Hanson / Erik Hanson vs Chris Takami / Dushan Angius4-6, 2-6
2026-06-15vs Las Posas RebelsSplit 11
L#1 DoublesSteven Hanson / Amal Gangodkar vs Tyson Lundring / William Dobbins2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesJay Idea / Cabot Richards vs Rainn Wilson / Rene Randel7-5, 6-4
2026-06-06vs Game Set BeerWon 40
W#1 DoublesMarc Roaquin / Miguel Delgado vs Korey Fleck / Tyler Fleck6-2, 7-5
W#1 SinglesCabot Richards vs Cary Winston6-4, 7-5
W#2 DoublesWilliam Schreiber / Matthew Maxel vs Adam Thomas / Emilio Pozzi6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesAmal Gangodkar / Christian Brown vs Richard Winton / Joe Mancuso6-2, 6-2
2026-05-31vs Wood ranch DukesLost 04
L#1 DoublesMarc Roaquin / Miguel Delgado vs Jeremy Corley / Rodrigo Retamoza6-7, 5-7
L#1 SinglesCabot Richards vs Garen Amirganian7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesSteven Hanson / Erik Hanson vs Artin Davodian / David Berkowitz1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesWilliam Schreiber / Jay Idea vs Greg Siegel / Keith Small0-6, 1-6
2026-05-09vs Sunset Hills SpartansLost 13
W#1 DoublesMarc Roaquin / Miguel Delgado vs Brandon McFadden / John Dunlop6-4, 6-2
L#1 SinglesSean Lawheed vs Paul Lorentzen0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMatthew Maxel / Jay Idea vs Chuck Mathews / Ron Best3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesSteven Hanson / Erik Hanson vs Talal Ansari / X Dennis Tang1-6, 5-7
2026-05-03vs NRCC RacketeersWon 40
W#1 DoublesMiguel Delgado / Marc Roaquin vs Brian Matthews / Adam Targum3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#1 SinglesCabot Richards vs Adrian Apodaca4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSean Lawheed / Matthew Maxel vs Brian Niehaus / Arkadi Chines6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesAmal Gangodkar / John Cotsis vs John Lyon / Bill Sutman7-6, 6-7, 1-0
2026-04-25vs Mission Oaks ScorpionsLost 13
L#1 DoublesMarc Roaquin / Matthew Maxel vs Punit Rawal / Sridhara Nagaraju4-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesMiguel Delgado vs Michael Prieve6-1, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesChristian Brown / Sean Bhardwaj vs Sudheendra Prasad / Justin Pittman2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesWilliam Schreiber / John Cotsis vs Ramprasad Gururaja Rao / Karthik Prasad6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Ventura - Men 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.12 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.29
Marc Roaquin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.27
Cabot Richards
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.24
Miguel Delgado
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #1 Singles 29% · published
3.21
Sean Lawheed
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.17
Matthew Maxel
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
3.14
Amal Gangodkar
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.07
John Cotsis
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.95
Jay Idea
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.73
Erik Hanson
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Sean Bhardwaj
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marc Roaquin + Miguel Delgado314 matchesnot enough data
Cabot Richards + Jay Idea123 matchesnot enough data
Matthew Maxel + Amal Gangodkar123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Marc Roaquin
10W–5L career · 6 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Cabot Richards
21W–24L career · 6 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.27
Miguel Delgado
5W–8L career · 7 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
3.24
Sean Lawheed
7W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.21
Matthew Maxel
8W–20L career · 6 lines in 2026
12%87%1%
3.17
3.5
Amal Gangodkar
5W–4L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
16%84%1%
3.14
John Cotsis
5W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
32%68%<1%
3.07
Jay Idea
2W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
63%37%<1%
2.95
Erik Hanson
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
97%3%<1%
2.73
Sean Bhardwaj
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.