Teams

KC-CC BLUE

2025 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · MEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER

10 players · average NTRP 3.17 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-05-26vs SKY NAVYWon 30
W#1 SinglesDave Joscelyne vs Roy Smith6-1, 6-1
W#2 SinglesAndy Stephan vs Mark Sabatos6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesRob Pine / Tyler Platte vs Brian Hunter / Justin Ramer6-4, 6-2
2025-05-19vs LTFC REDLost 01
L#1 DoublesDave Joscelyne / Andy Stephan vs Damon Piccone / Jeffrey Hilton4-6, 6-7
2025-05-12vs HRCA-N BLUEWon 20
W#1 DoublesAndy Stephan / Matthew Fagan vs Gary Dong / Andy Fishering6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMark Garcia / Rob Pine vs Ross Billows / Dan Cichy6-3, 7-6
2025-05-05vs EM ORANGESplit 11
W#1 DoublesAndy Stephan / Dave Joscelyne vs Mike Mohrman / Andrew Erb6-2, 6-2
L#2 SinglesRob Pine vs Paul Jost3-6, 2-6
2025-04-28vs WC NAVYLost 12
L#1 DoublesJason Bolinski / Dave Joscelyne vs Samuel Weigand / Kiril Naoumov2-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesAndy Stephan vs Michael Mrozek4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesRob Pine / Matthew Fagan vs Alex Cheng / Andrew Cheng7-6, 3-6, 1-0
2025-04-21vs KC-RH NAVYWon 20
W#1 DoublesOrlando Colamatteo / Dave Joscelyne vs Jim Riley / Randy Rosenburg6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesAndy Stephan / Tyler Platte vs Lance Willoughby / Alan Larson6-1, 6-2
2025-04-14vs HG REDLost 12
L#1 DoublesAndy Stephan / Mark Garcia vs Bill Clifford / Mark Burge6-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesDave Joscelyne / Jason Bolinski vs Stephan Tuchfeld / Bradley Isroff6-0, 6-1
L#2 SinglesRob Pine vs Nate Amack6-2, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings49 teams · MEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1KC-RH BLACK7028720254
2CHCC BLUE61251025244
3PRC BLUE5226926288
4WP GOLD52221330265
5DCC GREEN52231230275
6BCC BLUE52221332283
7WP SILVER52211432291
8HG TEAL52211433267
9PH NAVY52211433287
10GR NAVY52221334309
11HRCA-N GREEN52201535306
12HIW RED52201535314
13CP GOLD52201537307
14SS-HP PURPLE42161429249
15BTA-IBM YELLOW43211431281
16CP ORANGE43191633286
17KC-RH PINK43201534313
18LTC-M GREEN43181735288
19MEA GOLD43181739310
20HRCA-N ORANGE43171840296
21HW BLUE43181741316
22BCC RED43152043317
23HFII GREEN43171845352
24CVTA YELLOW34201536307
25CACM TEAL34191637301
26HRCA-S YELLOW34181738309
27PCC PURPLE34181738296
28HW TEAL34191639310
29ATC RED34171840305
30SS-LT ORANGE34181740327
31GTC PURPLE34152044314
32CP RED34171844324
33BTA-C RED34171844340
34KC-CC BLUE34152045345
35PTC PINK34152045344
36SKY ORANGE34152046325
37DTC PURPLE25161943325
38SS-H GREEN25152044309
39MEA PINK25122349352
40PCC GREEN25122351367
41BRMST PINK25112452353
42GCC NAVY16122350356
43SS-HP RED1692654370
44SS-LGT BLACK0682247329
45CP YELLOW07132249351
46PCRK RED07112454368
47CVTA GREEN0782756378
48LTC-M BLUE0782756373
49MVCC RED0753064400

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.00 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.20
Dave Joscelyne
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.19
Mark Garcia
published
3.07
Andy Stephan
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 3
3.04
Jason Bolinski
published
3.02
Matthew Fagan
published
2.92
Tyler Platte
published
2.83
Rob Pine
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.72
Marcus Garcia
published
Matthew Ninneman
published
Orlando Colamatteo
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mark Garcia + Andy Stephan7163% games+2.4% vs expected
Jason Bolinski + Matthew Fagan3454% games−1.2% vs expected
Mark Garcia + Matthew Fagan2349% games−6.8% vs expected
Rob Pine + Tyler Platte404 matchesnot enough data
Dave Joscelyne + Jason Bolinski213 matchesnot enough data
Rob Pine + Jason Bolinski213 matchesnot enough data
Tyler Platte + Jason Bolinski303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Dave Joscelyne
60W–53L career · 6 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.20
Mark Garcia
36W–32L career · no lines in 2025
<1%7%93%
3.19
3
Andy Stephan
52W–30L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%30%70%
3.07
Jason Bolinski
20W–12L career · no lines in 2025
<1%38%62%
3.04
Matthew Fagan
22W–13L career · no lines in 2025
<1%44%56%
3.02
Tyler Platte
17W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
2.92
3
Rob Pine
39W–59L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%90%10%
2.83
Marcus Garcia
4W–2L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
2.72
Matthew Ninneman
1W–10L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Orlando Colamatteo
18W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.