Teams

CV-Chris Alcorn

2026 CV-Spring Flex Singles · CV-Men 4.0

1 player · average NTRP 4.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2026-05-11vs CV-LLW-Jack TomberlinLost 01
L#1 SinglesChristopher Alcorn vs John Tomberlin6-1, 5-7, 0-1
2026-05-02vs CV-Anuj WadhwaWon 10
W#1 SinglesChristopher Alcorn vs Anuj Wadhwa7-5, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · CV-Men 4.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CV-LLW-Jack Tomberlin3030117
2CV-Brad Cotten2121219
3CV-Anuj Wadhwa2323644
4CV-Chris Alcorn1111218
5CV-Erik Michelson0101212
6CV-Tim Leckenby0202424

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.78 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
Christopher Alcorn
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Christopher Alcorn
8W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%92%5%
3.78

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.