Teams

WTC - Crowley 40 & Over 3.5 Mixed

2026 Dothan USTA Mixed 40 & Over Summer · 3.5 Mixed

9 players · average NTRP 3.21 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-07-23vs DO - CookSplit 11
L#1 DoublesDale Whittle / Carlene Sessions vs Elizabeth Odom / Houston Holmes4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesSandra Danford / Devin Snuggs vs Johnny Cook / Karan Barber3-2
2026-07-19vs DO - CookLost 12
L#1 DoublesSandra Danford / Dale Whittle vs Van Hughes / Benjamin Odom2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesCarlene Sessions / Devin Snuggs vs Johnny Cook / Elizabeth Odom7-5, 6-4
L#3 DoublesBilly Ernst / Vicki Bitney vs Justin Littles / Lindy Wood6-4, 1-1
2026-07-02vs DO - CookSplit 11
L#1 DoublesDale Whittle / Carol Hundley vs Lindy Wood / James Phillips1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesBilly Ernst / Vicki Bitney vs Karan Barber / Justin Littles6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2026-06-28vs DO - CookLost 03
L#1 DoublesVicki Bitney / Dale Whittle vs James Phillips / Elizabeth Odom1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesSandra Danford / Devin Snuggs vs Karan Barber / Houston Holmes6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJohn Crowley / Carlene Sessions vs Angie Mcdaniel / Joseph Cason1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Mixed have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.06 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.38
Sandra Danford
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.20
Carie Crowley
published 3.5
3.13
Carlene Sessions
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.09
Carol Hundley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.03
Billy Ernst
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.96
Dale Whittle
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.94
Vicki Bitney
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.92
Cathy Ogilvie
published 3
2.88
Devin Snuggs
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Devin Snuggs + Sandra Danford213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sandra Danford
7W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
80%20%<1%
3.38
3.5
Carie Crowley
16W–22L career · no lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.20
3.5
Carlene Sessions
8W–14L career · 3 lines in 2026
17%82%<1%
3.13
3.5
Carol Hundley
10W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
26%74%<1%
3.09
3
Billy Ernst
15W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%41%59%
3.03
3
Dale Whittle
6W–15L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%60%40%
2.96
Vicki Bitney
4W–32L career · 3 lines in 2026
67%33%<1%
2.94
3
Cathy Ogilvie
1W–18L career · no lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
2.92
3
Devin Snuggs
15W–8L career · type A · 5 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
2.88

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.