Teams

B1 ACAC Neumann

2021 Richmond Adult 40 & Over Weekend · Richmond Adult 40 & Over Women 3.5

10 players · average NTRP 3.31 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-08-14vs B4 SCC Sal’s Berries TornabeneLost 01
L#2 DoublesJeanette Kim / Sandra Neumann vs Mandy Tornabene / Bernie Spichiger6-7, 3-6
2021-07-31vs B7 Southampton BrownWon 20
W#1 DoublesValerie Stephens / Paula Bissett vs Beth Morris / Helen Landry6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJeanette Kim / Hilary Brodsky vs Margaret Duke / Jennifer Dortch2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2021-07-30vs B6 MRTC Hawley Battery Park 3.5Split 11
L#1 DoublesDiane Linderman / Jeanette Kim vs Olena Turner / Margaret Ryan0-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesValerie Stephens / Paula Bissett vs Carolyn Hawley / Sheila Crute6-2, 6-0
2021-07-24vs B5 Raintree StahlingWon 10
W#1 DoublesDiane Linderman / Valerie Stephens vs Mona Stahling / Barbara Portanova7-5, 1-6, 1-0
2021-07-17vs B8 Burkwood ClarkSplit 11
L#1 DoublesDorothy Hillgrove / Valerie Stephens vs Modestine Carter / Virginia Bowie4-6, 3-1, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJeanette Kim / Hilary Brodsky vs Susan Smith / Carolyn Shute6-4, 5-2
2021-06-26vs B4 SCC Sal’s Berries TornabeneLost 01
L#2 DoublesHilary Brodsky / Valerie Stephens vs Mandy Tornabene / Tricia Smith6-7, 2-6
2021-06-23vs B2 ACAC Naylor/HoeferLost 01
L#1 DoublesJeanette Kim / Ann Yates vs Kathie Naylor / Michelle Nelson2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 40 & Over Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.96 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.29
Diane Linderman
published 3.5
Jeanette Kim
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.19
Dorothy Hillgrove
published 3.5
3.14
Beth Farnsworth
published 3.5
2.95
Hilary Brodsky
published 3.5
2.84
Valerie Stephens
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.81
Donna Barrett
published 3
2.80
Margaret Peters
published
2.66
Ann Yates
published 3
Jennifer Cubitt
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Valerie Stephens + Jeanette Kim2343% gamesnot enough data
Donna Barrett + Margaret Peters134 matchesnot enough data
Ann Yates + Margaret Peters314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Diane Linderman
4W–4L career · no lines in 2021
1%93%5%
3.29
3.5
Jeanette Kim
203W–155L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
3.5
Dorothy Hillgrove
4W–6L career · no lines in 2021
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Beth Farnsworth
4W–6L career · no lines in 2021
14%86%<1%
3.14
3.5
Hilary Brodsky
2W–8L career · no lines in 2021
66%34%<1%
2.95
3
Valerie Stephens
125W–104L career · 5 lines in 2021
<1%88%11%
2.84
3
Donna Barrett
8W–10L career · no lines in 2021
1%92%7%
2.81
Margaret Peters
8W–7L career · no lines in 2021
1%92%7%
2.80
3
Ann Yates
6W–10L career · no lines in 2021
11%89%<1%
2.66
Jennifer Cubitt
2W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.