Teams

BHSC-Martinsen

2024 Charlottesville Adult 40 & Over · Charlottesville Adult 40 & Over 4.0 Men

7 players · average NTRP 4.00 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-07-23vs Forest Lakes Forever Young-JorgensenSplit 11
W#1 DoublesIan Caskill / Lorenzo Davis vs John Oliver / Rene Roy6-2, 6-7, 1-0
L#1 SinglesCharles Friel vs Ed Leary1-6, 2-6
2024-07-10vs ACAC Four Seasons Ballers-RidingsWon 20
W#1 DoublesLorenzo Davis / Richards Miller vs Chris Breeden / Henry Hickman6-2, 0-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesIan Caskill / Matthew Lucas vs Jordan Barr / Lloyd Raupp4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-07-03vs ACAC Four Seasons Ballers-RidingsSplit 11
W#1 DoublesLorenzo Davis / Richards Miller vs Derek Frazier / Melvin Herndon6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesCharles Friel / Henry Clifford III vs Jordan Barr / Russell Ridings4-6, 6-7
L#1 DoublesLorenzo Davis / Charles Friel vs John Oliver / Rene Roy5-7, 3-6
2024-06-19vs Forest Lakes Forever Young-JorgensenSplit 11
L#1 DoublesLorenzo Davis / Charles Friel vs Rene Roy / Wesley Shelley6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesIan Caskill / Christopher Hays vs Ben Jorgensen / Edward Lis6-3, 6-4
2024-06-12vs ACAC Four Seasons Ballers-RidingsWon 10
W#1 DoublesCharles Friel / Lorenzo Davis vs Derek Frazier / Melvin Herndon6-2, 7-5
W#1 DoublesLorenzo Davis / Charles Friel vs John Oliver / David Bowerman6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesTim Grossman / Ian Caskill vs Edward Lis / Rene Roy6-4, 6-3
2024-06-01vs ACAC Four Seasons Ballers-RidingsLost 02
L#1 DoublesRichards Miller / Lorenzo Davis vs William Manning / Jordan Barr6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesCharles Friel vs Derek Frazier1-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Charlottesville Adult 40 & Over 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.75 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.91
Richards Miller
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.90
3.87
Lorenzo Davis
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.86
Charles Friel
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #1 Singles 29% · published 4
3.74
Ian Caskill
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.19
Tim Grossman
published
Jim McVay
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Charles Friel + Lorenzo Davis12362% gamesnot enough data
Lorenzo Davis + Richards Miller9261% gamesnot enough data
Lorenzo Davis + Ian Caskill3352% gamesnot enough data
Charles Friel + Richards Miller314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Richards Miller
36W–16L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%75%25%
3.91
4
Henry Clifford III
3W–2L career · no lines in 2024
<1%78%22%
3.90
4
Lorenzo Davis
113W–70L career · 8 lines in 2024
<1%85%15%
3.87
4
Charles Friel
71W–37L career · 7 lines in 2024
<1%85%14%
3.86
4
Ian Caskill
71W–43L career · 4 lines in 2024
3%95%2%
3.74
Tim Grossman
3W–5L career · no lines in 2024
7%92%1%
3.19
Jim McVay
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.