Teams

RC REYNOLDS/BARR

2025 FW Adult 18 & Over League - Ladies · Saturday Ladies 2.5

6 players · average NTRP 2.50 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-04-18vs BIR CONRAD/LINGTONLost 01
L#1 DoublesChandler Hallum / Brooke Green vs Kayli Conrad / Shannon Morgan6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2025-04-07vs CCC PARKSSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMaggie Krenek / Alyssa Foster vs Alison Conlee / Jennifer Omana6-3, 6-1
L#1 SinglesHaley Snell vs Emily Winfrey2-6, 1-6
2025-04-06vs MCL MEYER/THOMASWon 10
W#2 DoublesBrooke Green / Lee Hallman vs Hilaire Baumgartner / Christine Gores6-4, 6-7, 1-0
2025-03-31vs MCL CANDELARIALost 03
L#1 DoublesRachel Lang / Haley Snell vs Anali Granados / Sharon Ogbonna2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesBrooke Green vs Jen Wagner1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesAlyssa Foster / Maggie Krenek vs Alexis Quan / Caroline Meekins0-6, 1-6
2025-03-15vs WAL MIONESplit 11
L#1 DoublesAlyssa Foster / Maggie Krenek vs Alice Stacey / Carri Brekeen6-2, 5-7, 0-1
W#1 SinglesRachel Lang vs Carolyn Peterson6-1, 4-6, 1-0
2025-03-09vs CCC PARKSSplit 11
L#1 DoublesRachel Lang / Alyssa Foster vs Lee Anne Leonard / Emily Winfrey2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesMaggie Krenek / Anna Barr vs Alison Conlee / Tracy Cannell6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2025-03-01vs MCL CANDELARIALost 12
L#1 DoublesBrooke Green / Haley Snell vs Anali Granados / Michelle Ebbens0-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesMaggie Krenek vs Nilza Boldenow6-7, 0-6
W#2 DoublesTaylor Reynolds / Alyssa Foster vs Jen Wagner / Caroline Meekins4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-02-22vs WAL MIONELost 03
L#1 DoublesMaggie Krenek / Alyssa Foster vs Carolyn Peterson / Apryl Henrichs2-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesRachel Lang vs Tina Pierce5-7, 5-7
L#2 DoublesTaylor Reynolds / Haley Snell vs Shannon Lee / Cindy Gardner2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Saturday Ladies 2.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.14 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Alyssa Foster
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.18
Brooke Green
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 2.5
2.17
Anna Barr
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.15
Haley Snell
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
2.05
Maggie Krenek
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Rachel Lang
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alyssa Foster + Maggie Krenek134 matchesnot enough data
Anna Barr + Maggie Krenek213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

2.5
Alyssa Foster
2W–4L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
2.5
Brooke Green
4W–11L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.18
2.5
Anna Barr
4W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
0%99%1%
2.17
Haley Snell
5W–5L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.15
Maggie Krenek
4W–8L career · 6 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.05
Rachel Lang
2W–3L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.