Teams

SBartle-ENO

2025 Eno River Singles 40 & Over · 40 & Over Singles 3.0 Women Evening

6 players · average NTRP 2.80 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-06-26vs ETurner-HRWon 21
W#1 SinglesSusanne Schmal vs Amanda Klein7-5, 6-2
W#2 SinglesPatsy Park vs Athena Samaras6-1, 6-1
L#3 SinglesChristine Kruse vs Jesse Shoemaker-Ramsey6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2025-06-25vs TPrinstein-HRLost 12
L#1 SinglesSusanne Schmal vs Michelle Koeneke1-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesShannon Bartle vs Jennifer Dunlap0-6, 0-6
W#3 SinglesLiz Schaller vs Lindsey McIver6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2025-06-17vs JRanheim-ENOLost 03
L#1 SinglesLiz Schaller vs Edith Becerra4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 SinglesSusanne Schmal vs Jean Cormier1-6, 0-3
L#3 SinglesShannon Bartle vs Pamela Howell-Davis7-6, 3-6, 0-1
2025-06-12Lost 01
L#2 SinglesLiz Schaller vs Leslie Jackson4-6, 4-6
2025-06-09vs KMcWhorter-HVCCLost 03
L#1 SinglesPatsy Park vs Deborah Hertzog3-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesChristine Kruse vs Lauren Powell1-6, 3-6
L#3 SinglesShannon Bartle vs Melinda Duncker0-6, 1-6
2025-05-22vs LKulp-ENOSplit 11
W#1 SinglesPatsy Park vs Ann Laros4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 SinglesShannon Bartle vs Lori Salzmann3-6, 1-6
2025-05-15vs MMacdonald-HSSplit 11
L#1 SinglesShannon Bartle vs Tynita Edwards1-6, 0-6
W#3 SinglesLiz Schaller vs Linda Naden6-0, 6-0
2025-05-08vs MFulton-UNCSplit 11
W#1 SinglesLiz Schaller vs Sara Knechtel6-4, 6-3
L#2 SinglesSusanne Schmal vs Leslie Heymann4-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Singles 3.0 Women Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.54 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.86
Patsy Park
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
2.71
Liz Schaller
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #3 Singles 40% · published 3
2.54
Susanne Schmal
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 2.5
2.43
Shannon Bartle
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #3 Singles 40% · published 3
2.19
Christine Kruse
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 2.5
Ashley Hinton
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Liz Schaller + Shannon Bartle21241% games+0.7% vs expected
Shannon Bartle + Christine Kruse1530% games−3.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Patsy Park
43W–45L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%85%15%
2.86
3
Liz Schaller
76W–108L career · type A · 5 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
2.71
2.5
Susanne Schmal
61W–43L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%38%62%
2.54
3
Shannon Bartle
40W–155L career · 5 lines in 2025
71%29%<1%
2.43
2.5
Christine Kruse
17W–60L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.19
Ashley Hinton
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.