Teams

A18 3.0W 6 WR2 Schenker

2025 NEOTA Adult 18 & Over Summer · NEOTA A18&O 3.0 Women Summer

17 players · average NTRP 2.67 / NORTHEASTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-07-17vs A18 3.0W 6 MV2 GorjupWon 31
W#1 DoublesJessica Treblas / Katie Fete vs Karen Frederick / Christine Olenik7-6, 7-6
W#1 SinglesAndrea Giaimo vs Meghan Walsh3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAngela Bolbach / Yiqin Huang vs Elisa Meadows / Yasna Ottens2-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesKalee Oberlin / Christina Cannata vs Kristin Blaser / karissa morcelle6-4, 6-4
2025-05-22vs A18 3.0W 6 MV2 GorjupWon 32
W#1 DoublesMichelle Schenker / Julie Kolar vs Christine Olenik / Meghan Sabitsch6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesAndrea Giaimo vs Meghan Walsh6-1, 7-6
L#2 DoublesKatie Fete / Katherine Bennett vs Susan Gorjup / Karen Frederick5-7, 3-6
L#2 SinglesJENNIFER GEORGE vs MEI LI1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesBrooke McClain / Stacey Drozda vs Michelle DeBaltzo / Yasna Ottens6-4, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NEOTA A18&O 3.0 Women Summer have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.51 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.19
Samantha South
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
2.89
Jessica Treblas
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.81
Katherine Bennett
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Andrea Giaimo
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.63
Kalee Oberlin
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.53
Michelle Schenker
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.41
Brooke McClain
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.41
Stacey Drozda
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.38
Katie Fete
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.36
JENNIFER GEORGE
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 2.5
2.23
Christina Cannata
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.21
Angela Bolbach
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.02
Isabel Lee
published 2.5
Julie Kolar
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Laura Giaimo
published
Melisa Anthony
published
Yiqin Huang
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Julie Kolar + Michelle Schenker6750% games+4.1% vs expected
Katie Fete + Michelle Schenker3446% games+2.3% vs expected
Angela Bolbach + Michelle Schenker2349% games+1.4% vs expected
Christina Cannata + Angela Bolbach0529% games+1.2% vs expected
Jessica Treblas + Michelle Schenker4349% games+0.3% vs expected
Angela Bolbach + Katie Fete2734% games−3.2% vs expected
Andrea Giaimo + Laura Giaimo1725% games−22.0% vs expected
Jessica Treblas + Angela Bolbach2546% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Samantha South
8W–8L career · 8 lines in 2025
8%92%1%
3.19
Jessica Treblas
60W–48L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
2.89
Katherine Bennett
14W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
1%92%7%
2.81
3
Andrea Giaimo
14W–21L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kalee Oberlin
28W–19L career · 8 lines in 2025
16%84%<1%
2.63
Michelle Schenker
27W–34L career · 1 line in 2025
40%60%<1%
2.53
3
Brooke McClain
14W–14L career · 6 lines in 2025
75%25%<1%
2.41
Stacey Drozda
21W–39L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%77%23%
2.41
Katie Fete
25W–62L career · 2 lines in 2025
81%19%<1%
2.38
2.5
JENNIFER GEORGE
17W–32L career · 1 line in 2025
0%86%14%
2.36
2.5
Christina Cannata
25W–50L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%98%2%
2.23
2.5
Angela Bolbach
25W–57L career · 1 line in 2025
0%99%1%
2.21
2.5
Isabel Lee
15W–37L career · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.02
Julie Kolar
29W–34L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Laura Giaimo
6W–42L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Melisa Anthony
43W–64L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Yiqin Huang
12W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.