Teams

Ja.Sage55A

2025 Capital Adult 55 & Over · 4.0 Men

11 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-05-07vs Ro.Hatlen55ALost 02
L#1 DoublesPatrick Wood / Sean Ahr vs John Winn / Andrew May2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJason Sage / Wes Snead vs Derek Kalinowski / James McCown5-7, 5-7
2025-05-01vs Bi.Francis55AWon 20
W#2 DoublesWes Snead / Pete Padilla vs Walid Mustafa / Chip Payne7-5, 6-3
W#3 DoublesGordon Bailey / Sean Ahr vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-04-24vs Da.McNeill55ALost 01
L#2 DoublesWes Snead / Tony Houser vs David McNeill / Randy Richardson2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-04-17vs Ke.Nowell55ALost 01
L#1 DoublesWes Snead / Joe Murphy vs David Anderson / W Troutman2-6, 6-7
2025-04-03vs Ma.Combs55ALost 01
L#3 DoublesJohn Wagner / Jason Sage vs Daniel Murphy / John VanDeWater4-6, 4-6
2025-03-30vs Da.McNeill55ASplit 11
L#1 DoublesPatrick Wood / Sean Ahr vs John Dunn / Larry Leins3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesJohn Wagner / Wes Snead vs Larry Essary / Jeff Chaffin6-4, 6-3
2025-03-29vs Ma.Combs55AWon 10
W#3 DoublesJason Sage / Terence McKee vs Scott McElreath / Daniel Murphy6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2025-03-27vs Bi.Francis55AWon 20
W#2 DoublesJoe Murphy / Wes Snead vs Keven Griffith / Bill Francis6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesGordon Bailey / Jason Sage vs Wayne Rivers / Christopher Jones7-6, 6-4
2025-03-06vs Ro.Hatlen55ASplit 11
L#2 DoublesTerence McKee / Wes Snead vs Andrew May / John Winn4-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesSean Ahr / Tad Buck vs James McCown / Derek Kalinowski6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.52 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.89
Kevin Wolborsky
published
Gordon Bailey
published 4
3.73
Mark Camacho
published
3.70
Wes Snead
usually #2 Doubles 46%, also #3 Doubles 39% · published 4
3.70
Joe Murphy
published
3.53
Jason Sage
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.42
Patrick Wood
published
3.40
Tony Houser
published
3.37
Terence McKee
published
3.24
Sean Ahr
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.18
Pete Padilla
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jason Sage + Wes Snead3349% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kevin Wolborsky
6W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.89
4
Gordon Bailey
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Mark Camacho
5W–5L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Wes Snead
101W–82L career · 13 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.70
Joe Murphy
4W–5L career · no lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.70
4
Jason Sage
85W–136L career · 6 lines in 2025
42%58%<1%
3.53
Patrick Wood
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
74%26%<1%
3.42
Tony Houser
4W–4L career · no lines in 2025
78%22%<1%
3.40
Terence McKee
2W–7L career · no lines in 2025
84%16%<1%
3.37
Sean Ahr
37W–57L career · 6 lines in 2025
3%94%2%
3.24
Pete Padilla
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
99%1%<1%
3.18

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.