Teams

USTA Atlanta/Michael Cecil

USTA Atlanta Fall - Adult 55 & Over Men Saturday · 4.0

17 players · average NTRP 4.00 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.82 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.17
Mike Amerson
published
3.98
Kerry Burden
published
3.91
Michael Cecil
published
3.85
Todd Dyleski
published
3.79
Mark Dubin
published
3.78
Mitchell Katz
published
David Schoen
published 4
3.67
Bob Gray
published 3.5
3.39
Keith Trawick
published
Dave Parkerson
published
Franklin Lim
published
Hector Vera
published
Jeff Benzon
published
Lang Adler
published
Trevor Naidoo
published
Yancy Waldow
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kerry Burden + Mark Dubin5256% games+5.4% vs expected
Mike Amerson + Michael Cecil8358% games+2.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Brian Scott Bortnick
2W–2L career · type S · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Mike Amerson
24W–10L career · no lines in 2024
11%88%1%
4.17
Kerry Burden
36W–19L career · no lines in 2024
<1%57%43%
3.98
Michael Cecil
43W–20L career · no lines in 2024
<1%75%25%
3.91
Todd Dyleski
32W–5L career · no lines in 2024
1%86%14%
3.85
Mark Dubin
25W–21L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.79
Mitchell Katz
6W–10L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%5%
3.78
4
David Schoen
20W–7L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Bob Gray
33W–15L career · type A · no lines in 2024
<1%12%88%
3.67
Keith Trawick
28W–9L career · no lines in 2024
78%22%<1%
3.39
Dave Parkerson
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Franklin Lim
5W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Hector Vera
15W–10L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Jeff Benzon
4W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Lang Adler
3W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Trevor Naidoo
17W–13L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Yancy Waldow
5W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.