Teams

TCU SCHNEIDER

2026 FW Summer Ladies Singles Social League · Monday morning 3.0

2 players · average NTRP / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-07-20vs TCU SCOTTWon 10
W#1 SinglesStacy Chillscyzn vs Marsha Scott6-3, 6-3
2026-07-14vs BIR FERRELLWon 10
W#1 SinglesStacy Chillscyzn vs Heidi Ferrell6-4, 6-7, 1-0
2026-06-29vs TCU SCOTTLost 01
L#1 SinglesMiriah Schneider vs Marsha Scott3-6, 6-7
2026-06-22vs BIR FERRELLLost 01
L#1 SinglesMiriah Schneider vs Andrea Riddle3-6, 4-6
2026-06-18vs STC KISTLost 01
L#1 SinglesMiriah Schneider vs Nourjan Bonney0-6, 3-6
2026-06-08vs BIR FERRELLLost 01
L#1 SinglesStacy Chillscyzn vs Chandra Holt6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2026-06-08vs TCU SCOTTWon 10
W#1 SinglesMiriah Schneider vs Marsha Scott6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · Monday morning 3.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1TCU SCHNEIDER54541081
2BIR FERRELL4343867
3STC KIST3333751

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.78 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.06
Stacy Chillscyzn
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.50
Miriah Schneider
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Stacy Chillscyzn
10W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%33%67%
3.06
Miriah Schneider
23W–34L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%49%51%
2.50

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.