Teams

CSRC

2021 Fredericksburg Adult 18 & Over Spring · Fredericksburg Adult 18 & Over Women 3.5

10 players · average NTRP 3.40 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-05-23vs Serve and SipWon 10
W#2 SinglesJudi Shoemaker vs Telly Salafia6-4, 7-6
2021-05-17vs Serve and SipWon 10
W#1 DoublesFrances Bouffard / Debbie Kem vs Emily Frank / Telly Salafia6-3, 6-2
2021-05-13vs Frame JobSplit 11
L#1 DoublesFrances Bouffard / Connie Fowler vs Lorrie Roberts / Catherine Stokes3-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesDebbie Kem / Christine Driscoll vs Cindy Meade / Jean Calloway6-4, 6-1
2021-05-10vs FCCLost 01
L#2 DoublesJoan Donoghue / Connie Fowler vs Dana Schuster / Dorota Sipko3-6, 6-7
2021-04-25vs FCCLost 01
L#1 DoublesJoan Donoghue / Debbie Kem vs Theresa Dressler / Dorota Sipko7-6, 6-7, 0-1
2021-04-11vs Frame JobLost 02
L#1 DoublesDebbie Kem / Joan Donoghue vs Lorrie Roberts / Catherine Stokes7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesJudi Shoemaker vs Nancy Siems6-7, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Fredericksburg Adult 18 & Over Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.00 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.12
Joan Donoghue
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.12
Debbie Kem
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.12
Melissa Hutcheson
published
3.09
Lisa Palmer
published
3.06
Frances Bouffard
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.96
Carolyn Beckham
published 3.5
2.89
Judi Shoemaker
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3
2.85
Susan Button
published
2.81
Tara Ford
published
Kathryn Davis
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joan Donoghue + Debbie Kem1126955% games−2.5% vs expected
Debbie Kem + Frances Bouffard9650% gamesnot enough data
Judi Shoemaker + Debbie Kem224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Joan Donoghue
200W–125L career · 3 lines in 2021
17%83%<1%
3.12
3.5
Debbie Kem
233W–165L career · 4 lines in 2021
17%83%<1%
3.12
Melissa Hutcheson
10W–13L career · no lines in 2021
18%82%<1%
3.12
Lisa Palmer
3W–4L career · no lines in 2021
24%76%<1%
3.09
3.5
Frances Bouffard
79W–103L career · 2 lines in 2021
32%67%<1%
3.06
3.5
Carolyn Beckham
0W–4L career · no lines in 2021
61%39%<1%
2.96
3
Judi Shoemaker
112W–135L career · 2 lines in 2021
<1%80%20%
2.89
Susan Button
12W–14L career · no lines in 2021
<1%88%12%
2.85
Tara Ford
20W–21L career · no lines in 2021
1%92%7%
2.81
Kathryn Davis
1W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.