Teams

MCTC/Hollis/Patrick

2026 COTA USTA Adult 18 & Over Weekday Women - Fall '25 · Weekday Women 2.5 - Thursday

7 players · average NTRP 2.50 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-11-05vs OVP/McNair/LillSplit 11
L#1 DoublesCecily Pennington / Victoria Long vs Abby Smoak / Larkin Kelly1-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesJaimie Hollis vs Paola de Santo6-4, 4-6, 6-1
2025-10-23vs OVP/McNair/LillWon 30
W#1 DoublesNatalie Pittard / Emily Carter vs Georgianna Lill / Abby Smoak4-6, 6-3, 6-4
W#1 SinglesJaimie Hollis vs Larkin Kelly3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesVictoria Long / Cecily Pennington vs Sonya Peel / Paola de Santo4-6, 6-4, 6-2
2025-10-16vs OVP/McNair/LillWon 20
W#1 DoublesVictoria Long / Jaimie Hollis vs Abby Smoak / Paola de Santo6-4, 4-6, 6-3
W#1 SinglesBrighton Patrick vs Sonya Peel6-1, 6-3
2025-10-02vs OVP/McNair/LillSplit 11
W#1 DoublesCecily Pennington / Brighton Patrick vs Paola de Santo / Abby Smoak6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesVictoria Long / Mary Ann Cottle vs Larkin Kelly / Brittany Schmitt2-6, 2-6
2025-09-25vs OVP/McNair/LillLost 02
L#1 DoublesEmily Carter / Natalie Pittard vs Abby Smoak / Georgianna Lill3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesCecily Pennington / Jaimie Hollis vs Larkin Kelly / Sonya Peel4-6, 6-7
2025-09-18vs OVP/McNair/LillWon 21
L#1 DoublesMary Ann Cottle / Cecily Pennington vs Georgianna Lill / Paola de Santo3-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesJaimie Hollis vs Whitney Ostrander6-4, 6-0
W#2 DoublesNatalie Pittard / Emily Carter vs Abby Smoak / Sonya Peel6-3, 6-2
2025-09-11vs OVP/McNair/LillSplit 11
W#1 SinglesBrighton Patrick vs Larkin Kelly6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesCecily Pennington / Jaimie Hollis vs Sonya Peel / Brittany Schmitt0-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Weekday Women 2.5 - Thursday
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1MCTC/Hollis/Patrick4313821189
2OVP/McNair/Lill3481327212

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.19 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.48
Brighton Patrick
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #4 Doubles 40% · published 2.5
2.17
Natalie Pittard
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.15
Victoria Long
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.09
Cecily Pennington
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.07
Jaimie Hollis
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Katie Werkin
published
Mary Ann Cottle
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

2.5
Brighton Patrick
14W–17L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%57%43%
2.48
Natalie Pittard
4W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.17
Victoria Long
4W–11L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.15
2.5
Cecily Pennington
2W–13L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.09
2.5
Jaimie Hollis
11W–15L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.07
Katie Werkin
1W–3L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Mary Ann Cottle
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.