Teams

LowLee Men

2022 Montgomery Tri-Level 18 & Over · Montgomery Tri-Level 4.0,3.5,3.0 Men

15 players · average NTRP 3.96 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule12 played
2022-12-16vs I'd Hit That 3xLost 02
L#1 DoublesRichard Laukitis / Christopher Lee vs Anthony Carle / Thomas Kolarik6-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMichael Vanderputten / Andy Blocker vs Sung Kim / Dan Hunt2-6, 4-6
2022-12-11vs String TheoryWon 10
W#2 DoublesMichael Vanderputten / Matt Baumann vs James Forbes / Christopher Williams6-4, 6-4
2022-12-03vs I'd Hit That 3xSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJuan Jose Tijero / Denis Vashuk vs Sean Der / Yuji Ohno4-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesChristopher Grant / Tucker Howard vs Sandeep Duvedi / Timothy Murphy6-1, 6-2
2022-11-29vs String TheoryLost 12
W#1 DoublesRichard Laukitis / Christopher Lee vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesPeter Kim / Hsuan Ou vs James Forbes / Christopher Williams6-7, 6-6
L#3 DoublesJi Cha / James Smith vs Tony Feric / Chris Takiar6-7, 2-6
2022-11-18vs I'd Hit That 3xWon 21
W#1 DoublesRichard Laukitis / Denis Vashuk vs Alexander Gerson / Yuji Ohno6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesAndy Blocker / Michael Vanderputten vs Jose Miguel Sacin / Simon Linder6-7, 3-6
W#3 DoublesChristopher Grant / Tucker Howard vs Timothy Murphy / Sandeep Duvedi7-6, 6-4
2022-11-14vs String TheoryWon 30
W#1 DoublesRichard Laukitis / Corey Glocker vs Brett Otero / Michael Zehr6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMatt Baumann / Michael Vanderputten vs Stephen Rawlings / Xavier Ona2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJames Smith / Ji Cha vs James Albert / Bryan Bassig6-1, 3-6, 1-0
2022-11-05vs I'd Hit That 3xLost 02
L#1 DoublesJuan Jose Tijero / Denis Vashuk vs Alexander Gerson / Matt Galosky4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMatt Baumann / James Smith vs Jay Anzures / Jim Leveque2-6, 2-6
2022-10-30vs String TheoryWon 20
W#1 DoublesJohnny Hsiung / Corey Glocker vs Mikhail Laryukhin / Wei-Chang Yang6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMatt Baumann / Surendra Babu vs Bruce Knolmayer / Christopher Williams6-1, 6-2
2022-10-22vs I'd Hit That 3xWon 20
W#1 DoublesCorey Glocker / Johnny Hsiung vs Sean Der / Matt Galosky6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesChristopher Grant / Tucker Howard vs Sean Alewine / Andrew Brammer6-1, 6-1
2022-10-19vs String TheoryWon 21
L#1 DoublesJuan Jose Tijero / John Lee vs Jason Church / Mikhail Laryukhin6-2, 5-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesPeter Kim / Michael Vanderputten vs James Forbes / Christopher Williams6-0, 0-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJason Baumann / Tucker Howard vs Mark Rossi / Chris Takiar6-2, 6-1
2022-10-11vs I'd Hit That 3xLost 02
L#2 DoublesMichael Vanderputten / Peter Kim vs Jay Anzures / Dan Hunt3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesChristopher Grant / Ji Cha vs Sean Alewine / Andrew Brammer7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2022-10-08vs String TheoryWon 20
W#1 DoublesJohnny Hsiung / John Lee vs Jason Church / James Wen6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesChristopher Grant / Matt Baumann vs Bruce Knolmayer / Anthony Sims6-1, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Montgomery Tri-Level 4.0,3.5,3.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.64 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.19
Richard Laukitis
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.05
Corey Glocker
published 4.5
3.95
Johnny Hsiung
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.81
Ji Cha
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.76
Tucker Howard
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
Christopher Lee
published 4
3.72
Juan Jose Tijero
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.56
Michael Vanderputten
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.48
Surendra Babu
published
3.38
Matt Baumann
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.32
Hsuan Ou
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Andy Blocker
published 3.5
2.84
Kevin Ro
published
John Lee
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michael Vanderputten + Matt Baumann303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Richard Laukitis
167W–99L career · 6 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
4.19
4.5
Corey Glocker
3W–2L career · no lines in 2022
36%64%<1%
4.05
4
Johnny Hsiung
573W–156L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%64%36%
3.95
4
Ji Cha
70W–32L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.81
4
Tucker Howard
173W–96L career · 4 lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.76
4
Christopher Grant
27W–8L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Christopher Lee
7W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Juan Jose Tijero
606W–366L career · 3 lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.72
4
Michael Vanderputten
224W–139L career · 9 lines in 2022
32%68%<1%
3.56
Surendra Babu
28W–17L career · no lines in 2022
<1%57%43%
3.48
3.5
Matt Baumann
225W–179L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%83%17%
3.38
3.5
Hsuan Ou
184W–78L career · 1 line in 2022
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Andy Blocker
4W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Kevin Ro
18W–15L career · no lines in 2022
<1%88%11%
2.84
John Lee
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.