Teams

Bl.Hutchinson18A

2024 Capital Adult 18 & Over · 4.5 Men

9 players · average NTRP 4.60 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-04-28Won 30
W#1 SinglesBrett Eckles vs Sebastian Zuhr6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJermaine Byrd / Joel Reiter vs Ben Thompson / Jeffrey Norris6-1, 6-1
W#2 SinglesKwame Owens vs Greg Raschke6-2, 6-0
2024-04-21vs Mi.Ladd18AWon 10
W#1 DoublesBrett Eckles / Kwame Owens vs Davis Felts / Jack Baur6-3, 6-3
2024-04-14vs Ma.Treires18ALost 12
L#1 DoublesJermaine Byrd / Visakan Jayakumar vs Simon Cagle / Matt Skelly2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesBlake Hutchinson / Kwame Owens vs William Boyette / Richard McClenny3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesBrett Eckles / Andrew Perdue vs Brandon Kessler / Drew Slocum6-2, 6-3
2024-04-07vs Be.Koren18AWon 20
W#1 DoublesJoel Reiter / Brett Eckles vs Victor Meir / Andrew Moretz6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesVisakan Jayakumar / Kwame Owens vs Brian Maher / Zac Vuncannon6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2024-03-17vs Pe.Kelly18AWon 21
W#1 DoublesJermaine Byrd / Ngoni Makambwa vs Raymond Xu / Joshua Leon6-3, 7-6
W#2 DoublesKwame Owens / Visakan Jayakumar vs Peter Kelly / Matthew Presser6-3, 7-6
L#2 SinglesBrett Eckles vs Ilya Moundous6-7, 2-6
2024-03-10vs Ma.Hanauer18AWon 10
W#1 DoublesJermaine Byrd / Ngoni Makambwa vs Davis Humphries / Jonathan Canon2-6, 6-1, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.22 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.43
Kwame Owens
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 5
4.42
Andrew Perdue
published 4.5
4.41
Brett Eckles
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 4.5
Blake Hutchinson
published 4.5
4.23
Visakan Jayakumar
published
4.18
Joel Reiter
published
4.06
Jermaine Byrd
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
3.83
Shravan Rajan
published
Ngoni Makambwa
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brett Eckles + Kwame Owens5165% games+13.5% vs expected
Brett Eckles + Andrew Perdue5254% games−0.4% vs expected
Jermaine Byrd + Kwame Owens4355% gamesnot enough data
Jermaine Byrd + Brett Eckles3255% gamesnot enough data
Visakan Jayakumar + Kwame Owens303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Kwame Owens
168W–57L career · 8 lines in 2024
71%29%<1%
4.43
4.5
Andrew Perdue
38W–14L career · no lines in 2024
<1%74%26%
4.42
4.5
Brett Eckles
223W–95L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%75%25%
4.41
4.5
Blake Hutchinson
1W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Visakan Jayakumar
28W–17L career · no lines in 2024
4%94%2%
4.23
Joel Reiter
4W–3L career · no lines in 2024
9%91%1%
4.18
4.5
Jermaine Byrd
136W–127L career · 4 lines in 2024
32%68%<1%
4.06
Shravan Rajan
3W–5L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.83
Ngoni Makambwa
3W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.