Teams

SNarayan-CHTC

2025 Eno River Adult 40 & Over · 40 & Over Adult 4.5 Men Weekend

14 players · average NTRP 4.40 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-04-17vs SBible-ENOWon 21
W#1 DoublesJames Easthom / Kyle Couch vs Srinivas Govindaraju / Uday Parikh6-3, 6-1
W#1 SinglesScott Benson vs Stewart Bible6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesMatt Piland / John Pelphrey vs Carlos Guerra / Edward Anderson4-6, 6-7
2025-04-06vs SBible-ENOWon 10
W#3 DoublesBoyd Blackburn / David Slack vs Edward Anderson / Benjamin Redmon6-3, 6-3
2025-03-30vs SBible-ENOLost 01
L#3 DoublesBoyd Blackburn / David Slack vs Abhi Bhirud / Richard McClenny5-7, 2-6
2025-03-23vs SBible-ENOWon 10
W#3 DoublesBoyd Blackburn / Kyle Couch vs Edward Anderson / Benjamin Redmon7-6, 6-4
2025-03-09vs SBible-ENOSplit 11
L#2 DoublesBrian Noga / Kenneth Nelson vs Carlos Guerra / Benjamin Redmon6-2, 1-2
W#3 DoublesBoyd Blackburn / Sravan Narayan vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Adult 4.5 Men Weekend have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.13 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.27
Sravan Narayan
published
4.21
Kenneth Nelson
published
4.21
Casey Black
published 4.5
4.21
David Slack
published 4.5
4.19
Gabriel Dichter
published
4.17
James Easthom
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.13
Erik J Erikson
published
4.07
John Pelphrey
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.06
Matt Piland
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.03
Boyd Blackburn
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.01
Kyle Couch
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.96
Brian Noga
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
Eric Labow
published
Scott Benson
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

David Slack + James Easthom213 matchesnot enough data
Matt Piland + Kyle Couch123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sravan Narayan
20W–4L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
4.27
Kenneth Nelson
6W–8L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
4.21
4.5
Casey Black
15W–8L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
4.21
4.5
David Slack
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
4.21
Gabriel Dichter
8W–8L career · no lines in 2025
8%90%1%
4.19
4.5
James Easthom
56W–28L career · 1 line in 2025
11%88%1%
4.17
Erik J Erikson
23W–9L career · no lines in 2025
18%81%<1%
4.13
John Pelphrey
6W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
31%69%<1%
4.07
Matt Piland
5W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
33%67%<1%
4.06
4.5
Boyd Blackburn
110W–117L career · 4 lines in 2025
40%60%<1%
4.03
Kyle Couch
2W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
47%53%<1%
4.01
4
Brian Noga
62W–44L career · type A · 1 line in 2025
<1%60%40%
3.96
Eric Labow
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Scott Benson
2W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.