Teams

QRRC-McKee

2022 OH OV FALL A18&O · Fall 4.0 Men Dayton

14 players · average NTRP 3.75 / OHIO VALLEY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-10-24vs KTC-HeinzLost 01
L#1 DoublesSCOTT WELDE / Mark Stoecklein vs Dan Zahorian / Matthew Cary4-6, 2-6
2021-10-15vs KTC-WaltersLost 02
L#2 DoublesDon Jenkins / Dave Baldetti vs Jason Merkle / Aaron Wolters4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesSteve Joseph / SCOTT WELDE vs Joe Balmer / Dane Ranney6-2, 1-6, 1-0
2021-10-10vs QRRC-TaylorLost 02
L#2 DoublesSteve Joseph / SCOTT WELDE vs Rick Hammerly / Cary Browne6-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesDon Jenkins / John Meehling vs Brooks Compton / Kevin Weaver4-6, 2-6
2021-10-02vs KTC-MadofforiWon 10
W#2 DoublesMark Stoecklein / Don Jenkins vs Roy Stevens / John Hauk1-6, 7-5, 1-0
2021-09-26vs WPAFB-PappSplit 11
W#1 DoublesSCOTT WELDE / Steve Joseph vs Nelson Gabriel / Ed Honore6-2, 7-6
L#2 DoublesMark Stoecklein / Don Jenkins vs Kevin Lopez / David Fogarty2-6, 6-7
2021-09-12vs SRTC-QuigleyLost 04
L#1 DoublesSCOTT WELDE / John Meehling vs Andrew Trapp / Bob Lyons4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#1 SinglesThomas Voss vs Andrew Hill1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMark Stoecklein / Givenson Piard vs Dean Williams / Steven Jain2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesDon Jenkins / Mark Montgomery vs James Oakes / Michael Bonilla2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Fall 4.0 Men Dayton have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.46 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
SCOTT WELDE
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Givenson Piard
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 4
3.42
Jeffrey Nabholz
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.41
Don Jenkins
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
Dave Baldetti
usually #1 Singles 38%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.22
Daryl Parks
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Gokul Srinivasan
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
John Meehling
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 30% · published
Marcus McDorman
published
Mark Montgomery
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Mark Stoecklein
usually #2 Doubles 89%, also #1 Doubles 11% · published
Steve Joseph
published
Thomas Voss
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Tom Noonan
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

SCOTT WELDE + Steve Joseph4547% games−0.2% vs expected
Givenson Piard + Jeffrey Nabholz5553% games−1.8% vs expected
Mark Montgomery + John Meehling123 matchesnot enough data
Daryl Parks + Mark Stoecklein123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

SCOTT WELDE
99W–99L career · 5 lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.81
4
Givenson Piard
31W–25L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Jeffrey Nabholz
45W–45L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%74%26%
3.42
4
Don Jenkins
6W–33L career · 5 lines in 2022
76%24%<1%
3.41
3.5
Dave Baldetti
13W–17L career · 8 lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Daryl Parks
56W–109L career · 2 lines in 2022
5%94%2%
3.22
Gokul Srinivasan
0W–4L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
John Meehling
33W–41L career · 10 lines in 2022
not enough data
Marcus McDorman
3W–10L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Mark Montgomery
4W–47L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Mark Stoecklein
51W–47L career · 9 lines in 2022
not enough data
Steve Joseph
8W–9L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Thomas Voss
17W–12L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Tom Noonan
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.