Teams

CROWN RED

2026 USTA ADULT 55 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 9.0 - 55 & OVER

6 players · average NTRP 4.38 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-06-07vs HMTC ORANGELost 03
L#1 DoublesSarah Shook / Susan Cheney vs Carmen Kilday / Kaili Young3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLaurie Feler / Janet Leverson vs Jennifer Wiley / Mitzi Johnson3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesNancy Zeigel / Jenifer Burger vs Gail Draper / Suzanne Hale0-6, 4-6
2026-06-06vs HMTC ORANGEWon 21
W#1 DoublesSarah Shook / Karen Lambert vs Mitzi Johnson / Kaili Young6-0, 6-4
W#2 DoublesSusan Cheney / Laurie Feler vs Carmen Kilday / Kimberly Tomlinson7-6, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesNancy Zeigel / Janet Leverson vs Suzanne Hale / Gail Draper2-6, 2-6
2026-06-06vs LTFCS BLUEWon 21
L#1 DoublesNancy Zeigel / Jenifer Burger vs Jennifer Liebowitz / Lucy Carson1-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesSarah Shook / Karen Lambert vs Sarah Marr / Deborah Jones6-0, 6-3
W#3 DoublesSusan Cheney / Laurie Feler vs Vicky Mediate / Irene Babcock6-2, 6-1
2026-06-05vs LTFCS BLUEWon 21
W#1 DoublesSarah Shook / Karen Lambert vs Shawna Walker / Lucy Carson6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesSusan Cheney / Laurie Feler vs Vicky Mediate / Sarah Marr4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesNancy Zeigel / Janet Leverson vs Karen Bluemel / Jennifer Liebowitz3-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 9.0 - 55 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.10 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.34
Sarah Shook
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.28
Laurie Feler
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.12
Janet Leverson
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.66
Nancy Zeigel
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
Jenifer Burger
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Karen Lambert
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Janet Leverson + Nancy Zeigel2442% games−1.7% vs expected
Laurie Feler + Karen Lambert5073% gamesnot enough data
Sarah Shook + Karen Lambert314 matchesnot enough data
Jenifer Burger + Nancy Zeigel033 matchesnot enough data
Nancy Zeigel + Karen Lambert033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Sarah Shook
36W–20L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%89%10%
4.34
4.5
Laurie Feler
47W–48L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%94%5%
4.28
4.5
Janet Leverson
37W–25L career · 3 lines in 2026
18%82%<1%
4.12
4
Nancy Zeigel
63W–59L career · 4 lines in 2026
10%89%<1%
3.66
Jenifer Burger
7W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Karen Lambert
14W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.