Teams

LA - Fireballs

2026 USTA Adult 55 & Over – LA · LA - Women 7.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.33 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-08-14vs LA - LATC 55+ WomenLost 12
L#1 DoublesMargery Teller / Kristin Farrand vs Laura Putney / Ilene Rosenzweig2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesBeverly Wilkerson / Marion Tumen vs Karen Chou / Megan Drynan0-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesDiane Audeon / Tracy HASBANIAN vs MARY WOODWARD / Diane Wagner6-3, 6-0
L#1 DoublesMargery Teller / Heidi Gibbs vs Ayuko Siegel / Jane Caldito3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 DoublesJustine Lassoff / Margery Teller vs Jane Caldito / Jacquetta Perkins4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesTracy HASBANIAN / Shizuko Takayasu vs Julie Rhee / Dena Siegel2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesDiane Audeon / Beverly Wilkerson vs Laura Laun / Miki Makiko Shimizu1-6, 2-6
2026-07-18vs LA - Roni's Rebels 55+Lost 12
W#1 DoublesMargery Teller / Shizuko Takayasu vs Veronica Deutsch / KARYN EILBER6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesMarion Tumen / Elaiza Capan vs Mari Bellas / Deborah Brandes2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesDiane Audeon / Tracy HASBANIAN vs Barbara Hemmerich / Lauran Jacks4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-07-11vs LA - LATC 55+ WomenLost 12
W#1 DoublesElaiza Capan / Justine Lassoff vs Portia Furst / Michele Sanchez6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesKathleen Foy-Asaro / Shizuko Takayasu vs Karen Chou / Laura Putney5-7, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesTracy HASBANIAN / Wangie Pineda vs Dayna Moelleken / Milinda McNeely1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · LA - Women 7.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LA - Canyon Rollers5112616130
2LA - LATC 55+ Women429921147
3LA - Roni's Rebels 55+237819138
4LA - Fireballs0551021134

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.13 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.45
Shizuko Takayasu
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.33
Justine Lassoff
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.31
Kristin Farrand
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.26
Kathleen Foy-Asaro
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Heidi Gibbs
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.22
Elaiza Capan
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.22
Wangie Pineda
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.04
Margery Teller
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.00
Marion Tumen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.97
Tracy HASBANIAN
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.94
Diane Audeon
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.69
Beverly Wilkerson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
Sandra Nervig
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Margery Teller + Shizuko Takayasu8461% games+8.0% vs expected
Beverly Wilkerson + Margery Teller7649% games+5.9% vs expected
Kristin Farrand + Justine Lassoff9456% games−0.2% vs expected
Diane Audeon + Margery Teller21137% gamesnot enough data
Kathleen Foy-Asaro + Shizuko Takayasu2446% gamesnot enough data
Diane Audeon + Tracy HASBANIAN123 matchesnot enough data
Kathleen Foy-Asaro + Tracy HASBANIAN213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Shizuko Takayasu
129W–141L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%65%35%
3.45
Justine Lassoff
24W–15L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.33
Kristin Farrand
25W–29L career · 1 line in 2026
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Kathleen Foy-Asaro
172W–163L career · 1 line in 2026
2%95%3%
3.26
3.5
Heidi Gibbs
0W–1L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
3.5
Elaiza Capan
12W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Wangie Pineda
96W–110L career · 1 line in 2026
5%94%1%
3.22
3.5
Margery Teller
81W–87L career · 4 lines in 2026
39%61%<1%
3.04
Marion Tumen
0W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
52%48%<1%
3.00
3
Tracy HASBANIAN
18W–43L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%58%42%
2.97
3
Diane Audeon
48W–72L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%68%32%
2.94
3
Beverly Wilkerson
71W–109L career · 2 lines in 2026
8%92%1%
2.69
Sandra Nervig
3W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.