Teams

AHeath (Queens)

2023 Combo Doubles 40 & Over League · 40 & Over 6.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-10-03vs KCronin/JJoliet (Piper Glen)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesDina Maguire / Kate Kirschner vs Paula Moss / Sheila Passenant6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2023-09-26vs LStrump/JCarnahan (Palisades CC)Won 20
W#2 DoublesSpencer Stoakley / Anna Sison vs Laura Richter / Dawn Houpt6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesDina Maguire / Kate Kirschner vs Amy MacDonnell / Lisa Gregoire4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-09-25vs LHuntington (Queens)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesAnna Sison / Spencer Stoakley vs Lisa Huntington / Julie Moore5-7, 2-6
2023-09-19vs KLee (Charlotte Indoor)Won 10
W#3 DoublesDina Maguire / Kim Gissy vs Jeannine Mortenson / Kristi Lee6-3, 7-5
2023-09-11vs PWaud/MLowman (WSRC)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesSpencer Stoakley / Kim Gissy vs Kathleen O'Donnell / Phyllis Waud5-7, 2-6
2023-09-05vs SNakai (Blakeney)Split 11
L#1 DoublesKelley Conrad / Kim Gissy vs Michelle Ludwiczak / Cynthia Spera3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesKate Kirschner / Holly Meloy vs Rosalie ORourke / Virginia Katzen7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2023-08-22vs PReimann/CLetorney (Park Road)Won 10
W#1 DoublesKara Tringali / Katherine Koppel-Dobbs vs Peggy Reimann / Lisa Cosolito6-0, 6-0
2023-08-15vs JDerrico/JSharpe (BCC)Split 11
L#1 DoublesKate Kirschner / Kim Gissy vs Wendy Lutgring / January Crimin3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesAnna Sison / Spencer Stoakley vs Kathleen Dorff / Christine Hotham6-4, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.93 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.34
3.06
Kate Kirschner
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
3.00
Kara Tringali
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.97
Kim Gissy
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.86
Spencer Stoakley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.84
Dina Maguire
published 3
2.84
Holly Meloy
published 3
2.82
Anna Sison
published 3
2.61
Anna T Heath
published 3
Kelley Conrad
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Anna Sison + Spencer Stoakley2354% gamesnot enough data
Kara Tringali + Spencer Stoakley314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Katherine Koppel-Dobbs
16W–12L career · no lines in 2023
<1%89%11%
3.34
3
Kate Kirschner
29W–26L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%33%67%
3.06
3
Kara Tringali
76W–67L career · 1 line in 2023
<1%49%51%
3.00
3
Kim Gissy
99W–80L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%59%41%
2.97
3
Spencer Stoakley
29W–62L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%86%14%
2.86
3
Dina Maguire
20W–39L career · no lines in 2023
<1%88%11%
2.84
3
Holly Meloy
1W–10L career · no lines in 2023
<1%89%10%
2.84
3
Anna Sison
4W–10L career · no lines in 2023
1%91%8%
2.82
3
Anna T Heath
4W–7L career · no lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
2.61
Kelley Conrad
24W–21L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.