Teams

Internationals

Adult 18 & Over Early Start · 5.0 Men

8 players · average NTRP 5.00 / SOUTHERN ARIZONA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-11-08vs LKWon 21
W#1 DoublesKarthik Chandrasekaran / Marek Dubovec vs David Clausen / Michael Pinkard7-6, 2-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesCody Petford vs Marc Avalos6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesBrian Ravesloot / Yao-Jan Wu vs Rolando Mascareno / Naren Shanmugavelu4-6, 1-6
2025-11-02vs LKWon 21
L#1 DoublesMarek Dubovec / Cody Petford vs Marc Avalos / Rolando Mascareno2-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesDavid Fink vs Luke Kauffman6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesBrian Ravesloot / Kyle Seyler vs Nicholas Feltes / Derek Kropp7-6, 6-3
2025-10-10vs LKWon 30
W#1 DoublesCody Petford / Bogdan Racolta vs Marc Avalos / Michael Pinkard6-1, 6-2
W#1 SinglesDavid Fink vs Luke Kauffman6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKyle Seyler / Yao-Jan Wu vs Nicholas Feltes / Derek Kropp4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-09-21vs LKWon 21
L#1 DoublesBrian Ravesloot / Cody Petford vs David Clausen / Michael Pinkard4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#1 SinglesDavid Fink vs Derek Kropp6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesYao-Jan Wu / Kyle Seyler vs Nicholas Feltes / Naren Shanmugavelu7-5, 6-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 5.0 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Internationals409310102
2LK043919129

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.58 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.87
David Fink
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 5
Bogdan Racolta
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.66
Cody Petford
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 5
4.59
Kyle Seyler
usually #1 Singles 70%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published
4.59
Brian Ravesloot
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 5
4.49
Marek Dubovec
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.45
Yao-Jan Wu
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.43
Karthik Chandrasekaran
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marek Dubovec + Karthik Chandrasekaran5157% games+2.0% vs expected
Brian Ravesloot + Marek Dubovec4353% gamesnot enough data
Brian Ravesloot + Yao-Jan Wu3350% gamesnot enough data
Yao-Jan Wu + Kyle Seyler314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
David Fink
42W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.87
5
Bogdan Racolta
14W–7L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
5
Cody Petford
3W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.66
Kyle Seyler
35W–9L career · 10 lines in 2026
<1%27%73%
4.59
5
Brian Ravesloot
38W–24L career · 3 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.59
Marek Dubovec
30W–24L career · 2 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.49
Yao-Jan Wu
13W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%64%36%
4.45
Karthik Chandrasekaran
16W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
no projection at this level
4.43

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.