Teams

LA MADRONA SR CM8.5A

2024 COMBO · Men 8.5

16 players · average NTRP 4.12 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-10-05vs RIDGEMARK G&CC CM8.5AWon 10
W#1 DoublesMichael Hiddleson / John Szymanski vs Daniel Holt / Jack Jenney6-4, 6-4
2024-09-22Lost 01
L#2 DoublesMichael Hiddleson / John Szymanski vs Reginald Breland / David Sperry2-6, 5-7
2024-09-15vs RIDGEMARK G&CC CM8.5ALost 01
L#2 DoublesClay Hausmann / John Szymanski vs Nicholas Cabassa / Aaron Francis3-6, 6-1
2024-08-31vs MONTEREY TC CM8.5AWon 10
W#3 DoublesJohn Szymanski / Manas Kshirsagar vs Sean Peterson / David Hernandez4-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 8.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.95 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.25
Kumaran Arul
published
4.14
Baron Bliss
published 4
4.13
Clay Hausmann
published 4.5
4.13
Jeff Shilling
published
4.09
Manas Kshirsagar
published
4.05
Scott Keller
published
4.03
Ian Allison
published 4
3.98
Christopher Fathman
published 4.5
3.98
Ramesh Theivendran
published
3.96
Michael Hiddleson
published
3.88
Tim Elfers
published
3.77
Casey Schirmer
published 4
3.66
Ed Costa
published 4
3.63
Lee Malaspina
published 4
3.61
John Szymanski
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
Jordi Aladro
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jeff Shilling + Scott Keller2446% games−4.0% vs expected
Baron Bliss + John Szymanski5156% gamesnot enough data
Lee Malaspina + Tim Elfers4156% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kumaran Arul
3W–3L career · no lines in 2024
3%95%3%
4.25
4
Baron Bliss
145W–63L career · no lines in 2024
<1%14%86%
4.14
4.5
Clay Hausmann
4W–2L career · no lines in 2024
15%85%<1%
4.13
Jeff Shilling
3W–6L career · no lines in 2024
17%83%<1%
4.13
Manas Kshirsagar
5W–1L career · no lines in 2024
24%76%<1%
4.09
Scott Keller
3W–6L career · no lines in 2024
34%66%<1%
4.05
4
Ian Allison
8W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%42%58%
4.03
4.5
Christopher Fathman
1W–5L career · no lines in 2024
56%44%<1%
3.98
Ramesh Theivendran
0W–5L career · no lines in 2024
56%44%<1%
3.98
Michael Hiddleson
1W–7L career · no lines in 2024
62%38%<1%
3.96
Tim Elfers
6W–2L career · no lines in 2024
<1%83%17%
3.88
4
Casey Schirmer
13W–6L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Ed Costa
3W–5L career · no lines in 2024
11%89%<1%
3.66
4
Lee Malaspina
9W–12L career · no lines in 2024
16%84%<1%
3.63
4
John Szymanski
132W–113L career · 4 lines in 2024
21%79%<1%
3.61
Jordi Aladro
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.