Teams

LCTA54/Crivella/Maybank

2022 LCTA 54 & Over Fall League · 54 & over - Women 3.5 Saturday

13 players · average NTRP 3.57 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2024-10-05vs LCTA54/Harper/IOn ClubWon 21
W#1 DoublesMichelle Crivella / Adrienne Eischeid vs MARY HOLTZ / Carol Welsman6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesKim Cole / Karen Craven vs Tracy Cassaday / Cathleen Mooney6-4, 7-5
L#3 DoublesCarmen Ullal / Dianne Newton vs Lisa Kuisel / Karen Felder4-6, 6-1, 0-1
2024-09-21vs LCTA54/Nimmich/LTP-DISplit 11
W#1 DoublesAdrienne Eischeid / Michelle Crivella vs Angela Parrott / Robin Parrott6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesKim Cole / Dianne Newton vs Nancy Pitcairn / Karen Easton3-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 54 & over - Women 3.5 Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.17 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.54
3.44
Michelle Crivella
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.34
Adrienne Eischeid
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.27
Denise Apple
published 3.5
Catherine Rama
published 3.5
3.21
Dianne Newton
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.20
3.19
Laura Bowers
published
3.05
Carmen Ullal
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.93
Michelle Copley
published
2.89
Langley Lester
published
2.77
Karen Craven
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Joyce Devine
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michelle Crivella + Adrienne Eischeid6264% games+15.8% vs expected
Karen Craven + Michelle Copley4547% games−9.7% vs expected
Carmen Ullal + Dianne Newton5551% games−14.1% vs expected
Karen Craven + Langley Lester134 matchesnot enough data
Michelle Crivella + Barbara Silveston314 matchesnot enough data
Catherine Rama + Barbara Silveston314 matchesnot enough data
Carmen Ullal + Karen Craven213 matchesnot enough data
Michelle Crivella + Dianne Newton213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Barbara Silveston
44W–22L career · no lines in 2022
38%62%<1%
3.54
Michelle Crivella
89W–59L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%66%34%
3.44
3.5
Adrienne Eischeid
51W–50L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
3.34
3.5
Denise Apple
37W–37L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Catherine Rama
11W–9L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Dianne Newton
28W–21L career · 2 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Catherine Kannenberg
35W–39L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.20
Laura Bowers
36W–40L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Carmen Ullal
22W–35L career · 1 line in 2022
34%66%<1%
3.05
Michelle Copley
34W–44L career · no lines in 2022
72%28%<1%
2.93
Langley Lester
51W–50L career · no lines in 2022
<1%81%19%
2.89
Karen Craven
26W–32L career · 1 line in 2022
2%94%4%
2.77
Joyce Devine
17W–8L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.