Teams

Olson

2024 Neb. Adult 40&Over · 3.0 Women

14 players · average NTRP 2.80 / NEBRASKA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-03-10vs NE/Gilroy/40&Over3.0WLost 04
L#1 DoublesSarah OShea / Bryana Shultz vs Deborah McDill / Sarah Smith1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAndrea Holka / Margaret Brockman vs Shannon Gilroy / Sarah Konigsberg1-4
L#3 DoublesBrenda Luers / Linda Friedrich vs Jacqueline Christensen / Erin Giannangelo0-6, 0-6
L#4 DoublesLaura Leeds / Susan Messersmith vs Jackie Conway / Erin Foley2-6, 1-6
2024-03-03vs ErnstLost 05
L#1 DoublesBryana Shultz / Xiaomei Guo vs Kristen Cline / Jennifer Knorr1-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesJENNIFER SCHWICHTENBERG vs Yulia Levchenko4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesSue Olson / Sarah OShea vs Yelizaveta Beltz / Mary Pat Loos0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMargaret Brockman / Brenda Luers vs Jessica Walsh / Julia Sandman1-6, 0-6
L#4 DoublesLinda Friedrich / Doris Dermann vs Sara Weyeneth / Dorothea Jacobsen0-6, 2-6
2024-02-18vs NE/Gilroy/40&Over3.0WLost 14
W#1 DoublesJENNIFER SCHWICHTENBERG / Bryana Shultz vs Jennifer Dwyer / Abbie Raikes6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesTeddi Remer vs Kirsten Holm-Caskey0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesAndrea Holka / Xiaomei Guo vs Shannon Gilroy / Sarah Konigsberg2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesBrenda Luers / Sue Olson vs Jackie Conway / Billie Dixon1-6, 1-6
L#4 DoublesMargaret Brockman / Susan Messersmith vs Erin Foley / Suzie Fogarty0-6, 1-6
2024-02-04vs ErnstLost 14
L#1 DoublesXiaomei Guo / Sarah OShea vs Yulia Levchenko / Yelizaveta Beltz4-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesKRISTIN WILLIAMS vs Dorothea Jacobsen0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesDoris Dermann / Susan Messersmith vs Robin Korte / Stephanie Randall0-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesJENNIFER SCHWICHTENBERG / Andrea Holka vs Sara Weyeneth / Dayana Corredor0-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#4 DoublesMargaret Brockman / Sue Olson vs Bobbi Clinch / Mary Wolfe3-6, 3-6
2024-01-21vs NE/Gilroy/40&Over3.0WLost 05
L#1 DoublesXiaomei Guo / Bryana Shultz vs Jackie Conway / Billie Dixon2-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesBrenda Luers vs Deborah McDill0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesSue Olson / Teddi Remer vs Julie Post / Lauren Simpson0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMargaret Brockman / Linda Friedrich vs Shannon Gilroy / Sarah Konigsberg0-6, 0-6
L#4 DoublesSusan Messersmith / Andrea Holka vs Jacqueline Christensen / Kirsten Holm-Caskey1-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.50 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Andrea Holka
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.71
JENNIFER SCHWICHTENBERG
usually #2 Doubles 25%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
2.63
Linda Friedrich
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published
2.52
Margaret Brockman
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #4 Doubles 40% · published
2.51
Bryana Shultz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.48
Sue Olson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 25% · published
2.44
Sarah OShea
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 25% · published
Doris Dermann
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.19
Brenda Luers
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 2.5
KRISTIN WILLIAMS
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Laura Leeds
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
Susan Messersmith
usually #4 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Teddi Remer
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Xiaomei Guo
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sarah OShea + Margaret Brockman1734% games−7.6% vs expected
Bryana Shultz + Sarah OShea0629% games−13.3% vs expected
Sue Olson + Sarah OShea2537% games−15.8% vs expected
Susan Messersmith + Andrea Holka044 matchesnot enough data
Sue Olson + Andrea Holka134 matchesnot enough data
Sue Olson + Margaret Brockman044 matchesnot enough data
Xiaomei Guo + Andrea Holka044 matchesnot enough data
Xiaomei Guo + JENNIFER SCHWICHTENBERG134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Andrea Holka
6W–33L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
3
JENNIFER SCHWICHTENBERG
18W–35L career · 4 lines in 2024
6%93%1%
2.71
Linda Friedrich
3W–12L career · 3 lines in 2024
15%84%<1%
2.63
Margaret Brockman
17W–57L career · 5 lines in 2024
44%55%<1%
2.52
3
Bryana Shultz
18W–50L career · 4 lines in 2024
48%52%<1%
2.51
Sue Olson
18W–57L career · 4 lines in 2024
57%43%<1%
2.48
Sarah OShea
19W–82L career · 4 lines in 2024
66%34%<1%
2.44
2.5
Doris Dermann
1W–10L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
2.5
Brenda Luers
2W–16L career · 4 lines in 2024
0%99%1%
2.19
KRISTIN WILLIAMS
8W–15L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Laura Leeds
5W–16L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Susan Messersmith
1W–20L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Teddi Remer
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Xiaomei Guo
3W–21L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.