Teams

Fr.Allison18T

2025 Capital Tri-Level 18 & Over · 3.0-3.5-4.0 Men

11 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-07-24vs Da.Wascher18TLost 01
L#1 DoublesLarry Leins / Randy Richardson vs Jeffrey Brooks / Kevin Abourisk6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2025-07-23vs Ro.Sellick18TLost 01
L#3 DoublesDan Rea / Matt Vaughn vs Emory Miller / Shawn Skillman0-6, 2-6
2025-07-17vs Sh.Lav18TLost 02
L#1 DoublesLarry Leins / Scott Cruikshank vs Jason Liner / Craig Atkinson4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesTim Lyon / Matt Vaughn vs Chun Lav / Brooks Lowe4-6, 0-6
2025-06-26vs De.Meares18TLost 01
L#3 DoublesDan Rea / Bruce Farrell vs Yee Nguyen / Dewayne Southern2-6, 2-6
2025-06-22vs Ev.Fultz18TLost 02
L#1 DoublesFrank Allison / Larry Leins vs Gabriel Iocco / Sam Osman2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesChad Smothers / Dan Rea vs Brian Ross / Leo Reece0-6, 1-6
2025-06-12vs Mi.Ratliff18TWon 10
W#3 DoublesBruce Farrell / Matt Vaughn vs Peter Flack / Joseph Williamson7-6, 6-0
2025-06-02vs Sh.Lav18TLost 02
L#1 DoublesLarry Leins / Randy Richardson vs Craig Atkinson / Jeffrey Monaghen3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesDan Rea / Matt Vaughn vs Darian Spell / Greg Myers1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0-3.5-4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.09 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Larry Leins
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.78
Scott Cruikshank
published
3.34
Robert Caulfield
published
3.29
Frank Allison
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.26
Bill Green
published 3.5
3.22
Douglas Marks
published 3.5
2.85
Matt Vaughn
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.78
Bruce Farrell
published 3
2.37
Dan Rea
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.22
Chad Smothers
published 2.5
Michael Tadych
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Frank Allison + Larry Leins5748% gamesnot enough data
Dan Rea + Matt Vaughn0530% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Larry Leins
62W–114L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%92%7%
3.81
Scott Cruikshank
15W–14L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.78
Robert Caulfield
9W–14L career · no lines in 2025
<1%89%10%
3.34
3.5
Frank Allison
102W–149L career · 7 lines in 2025
1%94%5%
3.29
3.5
Bill Green
19W–13L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Douglas Marks
4W–15L career · no lines in 2025
5%94%2%
3.22
3
Matt Vaughn
71W–94L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%88%12%
2.85
3
Bruce Farrell
13W–11L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%4%
2.78
3
Dan Rea
36W–100L career · 4 lines in 2025
85%15%<1%
2.37
2.5
Chad Smothers
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.22
Michael Tadych
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.