Teams

Seminole Lake Coke

2022 Pinellas Adult 40 & Over Spring Weekend · 3.5 W Saturday

8 players · average NTRP 3.43 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-06-11vs Seminole Lake KelseyLost 01
L#1 SinglesRenee DiVincent vs Jessica Tas3-6, 1-6
2022-06-04vs Tarpon BourgeoisLost 02
L#1 DoublesEsthela Gonzalez / Kim Williams vs Judy Carlin / Sherrie Bourgeois3-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesRenee DiVincent vs Jani Parrish4-6, 5-7
2022-05-21vs Belleair LeaLost 01
L#2 DoublesRenee DiVincent / Jeanne Ann Killam vs Lori Emery / Ann Lea1-6, 2-6
2022-05-14vs ELW FriesLost 01
L#1 SinglesRenee DiVincent vs Lou Reavis5-7, 7-6, 1-0
2022-05-07vs Pinellas - Bardmoor/GrossLost 01
L#2 DoublesLisa Lowe / Esthela Gonzalez vs Victoria Tuller / Chieko Perry0-6, 2-6
2022-04-30Split 11
W#1 SinglesRenee DiVincent vs W A Mantell6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesEsthela Gonzalez / Deborah Larsen vs Svetlana Sidorova / Yve Feinberg5-7, 4-6
2022-04-16vs Seminole Lake KelseyLost 01
L#1 SinglesRenee DiVincent vs Jessica Tas2-6, 2-6
2022-04-02vs ELW FriesLost 02
L#1 DoublesCarrie Gelston / Esthela Gonzalez vs Bea Lynch / Tara Miller6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesRenee DiVincent vs Martha Cornatzer2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 W Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.09 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.35
Deborah Larsen
published 3.5
Chary Acevedo
published 3.5
3.22
Diane Haymes
published 3.5
3.21
Esthela Gonzalez
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.17
Denise White
published 3.5
2.94
Lisa Lowe
published
2.88
Renee DiVincent
usually #1 Singles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 3
2.85
Danielle Coke
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Esthela Gonzalez + Renee DiVincent2345% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Deborah Larsen
7W–4L career · no lines in 2022
<1%87%13%
3.35
3.5
Chary Acevedo
7W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Diane Haymes
7W–9L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Esthela Gonzalez
127W–148L career · 4 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Denise White
7W–8L career · no lines in 2022
9%90%1%
3.17
Lisa Lowe
2W–8L career · no lines in 2022
66%34%<1%
2.94
3
Renee DiVincent
99W–127L career · 7 lines in 2022
<1%83%17%
2.88
3.5
Danielle Coke
6W–5L career · no lines in 2022
87%13%<1%
2.85

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.