Teams

Wynlakes Montgomery

2026 55 & Over Southern Combo Doubles Night - Montgomery · 7.5 Combo Women

11 players · average NTRP 4.00 / ALABAMA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-07-24vs Wynlakes SkierLost 02
L#1 DoublesKimberly Mathews / Leah Leal vs Darlene Skier / Linda Ward2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesCarol Telehany / Melissa Snowden vs Sandra Putz / Sueanne Reynolds1-6, 0-6
2026-07-20vs Wynlakes SkierLost 03
L#1 DoublesAnn Osten / Lisa Zanglin vs Darlene Skier / Cheryl Martin4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesLeah Leal / Sid Utsey vs Diane Locke / Michelle Slack1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesCarol Telehany / Melissa Snowden vs Sueanne Reynolds / Sandra Putz1-6, 3-6
2026-07-13vs Wynlakes SkierLost 12
W#1 DoublesJulie Brand / Melissa Snowden vs Darlene Skier / Tammy Hayes7-5, 7-5
L#2 DoublesLeah Leal / Sid Utsey vs Michelle Slack / Diane Locke3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesAnn Osten / Lisa Zanglin vs Ellen Sharan / Angel Garrett7-6, 6-7, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 7.5 Combo Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Wynlakes Skier3072566
2Wynlakes Montgomery03271496

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.39 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.65
Darlene Skier
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.54
Ann Osten
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.48
Leah Leal
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.44
Sid Utsey
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.41
Julie Brand
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.40
Melissa Snowden
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.35
Carol Telehany
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.31
Leigh Chappelle
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.29
Kelly DeLaitsch
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.22
Lisa Zanglin
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.17
Kimberly Mathews
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sid Utsey + Leigh Chappelle224 matchesnot enough data
Carol Telehany + Lisa Zanglin033 matchesnot enough data
Lisa Zanglin + Sid Utsey033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Darlene Skier
17W–15L career · 3 lines in 2026
13%86%1%
3.65
4
Ann Osten
4W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
39%61%<1%
3.54
Leah Leal
11W–17L career · 3 lines in 2026
57%43%<1%
3.48
Sid Utsey
27W–20L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%67%33%
3.44
Julie Brand
12W–32L career · 1 line in 2026
74%26%<1%
3.41
Melissa Snowden
5W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%77%23%
3.40
4
Carol Telehany
6W–15L career · 2 lines in 2026
85%15%<1%
3.35
Leigh Chappelle
28W–18L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%90%8%
3.31
Kelly DeLaitsch
15W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
2%91%7%
3.29
Lisa Zanglin
25W–26L career · 2 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.22
Kimberly Mathews
4W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
11%88%1%
3.17

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.