Teams

Meadows Purple YaYas

2024 Sarasota Social 70 & Over Women Wed FALL · 7.0 W Wednesdays

10 players · average NTRP 3.42 / REGION_5

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-12-18vs Courtside FeldmeierWon 10
W#2 Female DoublesKaren Matthews / Terri Costa vs Mary Lou Irish / Lorraine Lynn6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2024-12-06vs Payne Park Hall 70Won 10
W#1 Female DoublesLinda Hosmer / Karen Matthews vs Janet Hepner / Linda Kretlow6-0, 6-0
2024-11-13vs IslandWalk SeñorasLost 01
L#1 Female DoublesChrista Ruppert / Karen Matthews vs Nancy Dickson / Barbara Babb0-6, 1-6
2024-10-29vs IslandWalk SeñorasLost 01
L#1 Female DoublesKaren Matthews / Catherine Hawkins vs Nancy Dickson / Barbara Babb2-6, 2-6
2024-10-02vs Royal PaynesLost 01
L#2 Female DoublesChrista Ruppert / Karen Matthews vs Jean Caudle / Pamela Deems4-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 W Wednesdays have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.11 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.43
Donna Spielberger
published 3.5
3.31
Alice Levine
published 3.5
3.26
Catherine Hynes
published 3.5
3.09
Catherine Hawkins
published 3.5
2.81
Christa Ruppert
published 3.5
2.78
Becky Pomfret
published 3
Julie Harris
published
Karen Matthews
usually #1 Female Doubles 60%, also #2 Female Doubles 40% · published
Linda Hosmer
published
Terri Costa
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Terri Costa + Karen Matthews7452% gamesnot enough data
Donna Spielberger + Alice Levine5162% gamesnot enough data
Becky Pomfret + Catherine Hynes123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Donna Spielberger
50W–38L career · no lines in 2024
<1%70%30%
3.43
3.5
Alice Levine
49W–37L career · no lines in 2024
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Catherine Hynes
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Catherine Hawkins
4W–6L career · no lines in 2024
24%76%<1%
3.09
3.5
Christa Ruppert
0W–3L career · no lines in 2024
93%7%<1%
2.81
3
Becky Pomfret
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%5%
2.78
Julie Harris
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Karen Matthews
53W–67L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
Linda Hosmer
1W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Terri Costa
11W–7L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.