← Teams

PTC-Lee/Daoud

2025 Mixed 18 & Over · 6.0 Mixed

9 players · average NTRP 3.06 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 2.94 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.39
Juan Arenas
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.23
Tim Janes
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.96
Alexander Abrazaldo
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.87
Jeny Joseph
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.85
Michael Navarro
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
—
Kate Maher
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.75
Richard Mendez
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.73
Kathleen Crowley
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.71
Katja Daoud
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Results8 ties
2024-11-22Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesJeny Joseph / Richard Mendez vs Thomas Croll / Becca Perry6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesRose Lee / Tim Janes vs Michelle Gay / Joseph Comer6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesAlexander Abrazaldo / Kathleen Crowley vs Kapil Dev / Angela Diaz de Leon6-2, 6-1
2024-11-17Lost 0–1
L#1 DoublesJuan Arenas / Elizabeth Fox vs Zhong Lei / Catherine Huang3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-10-19Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesKatja Daoud / Tim Janes vs Gilbert Chiang / Katie Macadam4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKathleen Crowley / Scott Myers vs Brian Patrick / Ivy Lane6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesAlexander Abrazaldo / Emma Chait vs Carmen Timberlake / Brendan Lyon6-2, 6-1
2024-10-12Split 1–1
W#1 DoublesKate Maher / Tim Janes vs Julia Henry / Mark Hopkins3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJeny Joseph / Michael Navarro vs Crystal Ounaphom / Erik Bucher6-1, 6-3
2024-10-05Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesRichard Mendez / Emma Chait vs Adrienne Dedelow / Jeff Kovel6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJuan Arenas / Elizabeth Fox vs Erik Garcia / Lea Rodgers6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesSteve Siegel / Jeny Joseph vs Zachary Kersten / Kathleen Huffman6-0, 6-1
2024-09-29Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesKate Maher / Richard Mendez vs Adriana McCord / Jody McCord6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKatja Daoud / Scott Myers vs Samantha Damiano / Chris Simpson6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesKathleen Crowley / Michael Navarro vs Khaden Jee / Kara Petracca6-4, 6-2
2024-09-15Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesRichard Mendez / Jeny Joseph vs Thomas Croll / Becca Perry6-0, 6-4
W#2 DoublesAlexander Abrazaldo / Kate Maher vs Geoff Shields / Angela Diaz de Leon6-2, 6-2
2024-09-08Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesKate Maher / Richard Mendez vs Qin Lian / Qiming Wang7-5, 6-4
L#2 DoublesEmma Chait / Tim Janes vs Yuxia Ouyang / Xiaolin Nan7-5, 6-1
L#3 DoublesKatja Daoud / Steve Siegel vs Julie Ahn / Ye Jiang6-0, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Juan Arenas
23W–32L career
0%94%6%
3.39
3
Tim Janes
47W–53L career
0%18%82%
3.23
3
Alexander Abrazaldo
24W–15L career
0%86%14%
2.96
3
Jeny Joseph
75W–91L career
0%98%2%
2.87
3
Michael Navarro
27W–39L career
0%97%3%
2.85
3
Kate Maher
36W–11L career
not enough data
—
3
Richard Mendez
10W–6L career · type M
5%93%2%
2.75
3
Kathleen Crowley
60W–51L career
5%94%1%
2.73
3
Katja Daoud
71W–70L career
2%98%0%
2.71

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.