Teams

CCO Steed

2025 Marion Trilevel 18 & Over · 4.0

14 players · average NTRP 3.90 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-03-21vs Marion/Centonze/4.0/3.5/3.0WSplit 11
W#1 DoublesEileen Lombardo / Lisa Steed vs Nancy Little / Nicole DeBolt6-7, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLucy Kaul / Shawn Ridgely vs Lisa Booth / Sharon Christie Ybanez1-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-03-15vs Marion/Centonze/4.0/3.5/3.0WLost 01
L#1 DoublesAmanda Miller / Debby Watts vs Andrea Harden / Nicole Millsaps5-7, 3-6
2025-03-10vs Marion/Centonze/4.0/3.5/3.0WLost 01
L#2 DoublesAbigail Dellovade / Lauren Stevenson vs Lisa Booth / Kayleen Quinn6-1, 5-7, 0-1
2025-03-02vs Marion/Centonze/4.0/3.5/3.0WWon 20
W#1 DoublesAmanda Miller / Eileen Lombardo vs Susan Atwell / Nicole Millsaps6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAbigail Dellovade / Melissa Galloway vs Kayleen Quinn / Pamela Rice6-4, 6-1
2025-02-21vs Marion/Centonze/4.0/3.5/3.0WSplit 11
L#1 DoublesTanner Watts / Debby Watts vs Nicole DeBolt / Nicole Millsaps6-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesAbigail Dellovade / Melissa Galloway vs Sharon Christie Ybanez / Pamela Rice6-1, 6-1
2025-01-18vs Marion/Centonze/4.0/3.5/3.0WWon 10
W#2 DoublesLucy Kaul / Shawn Ridgely vs Sharon Christie Ybanez / Carol Mecca6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.47 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.89
Tanner Watts
published
3.87
Eileen Lombardo
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.80
Debby Watts
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.76
Abigail Dellovade
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.75
Lauren Stevenson
published
3.72
Dana Pine
published 4
3.61
Lisa Steed
published
3.37
Lucy Kaul
published
3.26
Rebecca Long
published
3.19
Shawn Ridgely
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.06
Janet Greene
published
2.94
Kristin Milbrandt
published
2.84
Lauren Joyce
published
Guisela Carrascosa
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tanner Watts
4W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.89
4
Eileen Lombardo
304W–158L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
3.87
4
Debby Watts
186W–79L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%91%8%
3.80
4
Abigail Dellovade
137W–49L career · 7 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.76
Lauren Stevenson
5W–5L career · no lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.75
4
Dana Pine
7W–5L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.72
Lisa Steed
15W–10L career · no lines in 2025
22%77%<1%
3.61
Lucy Kaul
19W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
3.37
Rebecca Long
24W–28L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.26
3.5
Shawn Ridgely
28W–26L career · 2 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
Janet Greene
26W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%33%67%
3.06
Kristin Milbrandt
13W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%65%34%
2.94
Lauren Joyce
8W–8L career · no lines in 2025
1%86%13%
2.84
Guisela Carrascosa
5W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.