Teams

OAKLAND HILLS 40AW3.0A

2025 ADULT 40&Over · Women's 3.0

10 players · average NTRP 2.50 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-03-15vs LANEY TA/DAVIE STADIUM 40AW3.0ALost 04
L#1 DoublesRosalyn Evans / Signe Darpinian vs Maria Debenedetti / Audrey Schroeder1-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesMinjon Hall vs Julia Gillette0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJanelle Jones / Sarah Sullivan vs Kasey Chung / Tracy Jensen3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesBonnie Taylor / eve levine vs Lana Rak / Diane Simpson1-6, 1-6
2025-01-25vs LANEY TA/DAVIE STADIUM 40AW3.0ALost 12
L#1 DoublesJenny Pfeiffer / Minjon Hall vs Maria Debenedetti / Audrey Schroeder4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesLauren Addicott / Janelle Jones vs Laura Sumrall / Grace Man7-6, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 Doubleseve levine / Celeste Winkel vs Kasey Chung / Elaine Hackenkamp1-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women's 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.64 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.16
Minjon Hall
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.01
Nicole Kelly
published
3.00
Janelle Jones
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.88
Lauren Addicott
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.48
Rosalyn Evans
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.46
Kellie Mccool
published
2.45
eve levine
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.43
joan pezanoski
published
2.35
Valerie Boes
published
2.16
Celeste Winkel
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Minjon Hall + Lauren Addicott5065% games+2.9% vs expected
Valerie Boes + joan pezanoski033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Minjon Hall
34W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%10%90%
3.16
Nicole Kelly
8W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%48%52%
3.01
Janelle Jones
20W–18L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%50%50%
3.00
Lauren Addicott
22W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%83%17%
2.88
Rosalyn Evans
2W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
55%45%<1%
2.48
Kellie Mccool
1W–6L career · no lines in 2025
61%39%<1%
2.46
eve levine
2W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
66%34%<1%
2.45
joan pezanoski
2W–12L career · no lines in 2025
71%29%<1%
2.43
Valerie Boes
4W–14L career · no lines in 2025
87%13%<1%
2.35
2.5
Celeste Winkel
1W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.16

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.