Teams

Foster

2026 NETX Adult 18 & Over · 4.5 Women

13 players · average NTRP 4.38 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-06-03vs RobertsWon 32
L#1 DoublesMandy Ashton / Kourtney Chumbley vs Robin Edgemon / Vivien Duarte1-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesKristi Foster vs Sarah Phillips6-2, 6-0
L#2 DoublesLana Parker / Karen Martell vs Patti Bean / Yan Liu2-6, 0-6
W#2 SinglesSarah Teves vs Bianca Haynes6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJulie Blavier / Cathy Carter vs Lauren Whitus / Sharyn McElmurry6-3, 6-3
2026-05-20vs RobertsWon 32
W#1 DoublesLana Parker / Mandy Ashton vs Callie Morton / Robin Edgemon4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#1 SinglesLeiLani Chatterton vs Lauren Arnold6-1, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKristi Foster / Cathy Carter vs Katie Heimer / Lauren Whitus6-1, 6-3
L#2 SinglesSarah Teves vs Nichole Lowe2-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesAshlea Wupperman / Allison Ewert vs Shuku Roberts / Patti Bean6-4, 6-3
2026-05-13vs RobertsLost 23
W#1 DoublesAndrea Booth / Allison Ewert vs Robin Edgemon / Vivien Duarte7-6, 6-2
W#1 SinglesSarah Teves vs Kamryn Hightower6-0, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLana Parker / LeiLani Chatterton vs Patti Bean / Shuku Roberts1-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesShelby Hart vs Lauren Arnold7-6, 0-4
L#3 DoublesKaren Martell / Karen Braaten vs Katie Heimer / KP Pierce2-6, 1-6
2026-05-06vs RobertsWon 32
L#1 DoublesAndrea Booth / Mandy Ashton vs KP Pierce / Nichole Lowe1-6, 3-2
W#1 SinglesKristi Foster vs Bianca Haynes6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesLeiLani Chatterton / Julie Blavier vs Patti Bean / Yan Liu4-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesSarah Teves vs Sarah Phillips6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesLana Parker / Kourtney Chumbley vs Callie Morton / Sharyn McElmurry7-6, 6-4
2026-04-29vs RobertsWon 41
L#1 DoublesAllison Ewert / Andrea Booth vs KP Pierce / Nichole Lowe5-6
W#1 SinglesSarah Teves vs Kamryn Hightower6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesKaren Martell / Kourtney Chumbley vs Robin Edgemon / Vivien Duarte3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 SinglesShelby Hart vs Callie Morton6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAmy Mills / Kristi Foster vs Yan Liu / Shuku Roberts6-2, 6-4
2026-04-22vs RobertsLost 23
W#1 DoublesJulie Blavier / LeiLani Chatterton vs Vivien Duarte / Robin Edgemon1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesSarah Teves vs Sarah Phillips6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesCathy Carter / Mandy Ashton vs Shuku Roberts / Yan Liu1-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesKaren Braaten vs Lauren Arnold2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesKristi Foster / Ashlea Wupperman vs KP Pierce / Nichole Lowe3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 4.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Foster42171331255
2Roberts24131736256

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.05 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.51
Andrea Booth
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.30
Kristi Foster
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
4.22
Ashlea Wupperman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.21
LeiLani Chatterton
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
4.21
Allison Ewert
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.16
Shelby Hart
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.92
Karen Martell
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.90
Karen Braaten
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
3.88
Cathy Carter
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.87
Mandy Ashton
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.83
Sarah Teves
usually #1 Singles 44%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
3.81
Julie Blavier
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.80
Lana Parker
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Allison Ewert + Ashlea Wupperman4158% games+5.8% vs expected
Kristi Foster + Ashlea Wupperman4254% games−10.2% vs expected
Lana Parker + Julie Blavier134 matchesnot enough data
Andrea Booth + Lana Parker213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Andrea Booth
11W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%46%54%
4.51
Kristi Foster
21W–5L career · 5 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
4.30
4.5
Ashlea Wupperman
11W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
4.22
LeiLani Chatterton
3W–13L career · 4 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
4.21
4.5
Allison Ewert
9W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
4.21
Shelby Hart
12W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
12%87%1%
4.16
Karen Martell
6W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
73%27%<1%
3.92
Karen Braaten
5W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
75%25%<1%
3.90
4
Cathy Carter
10W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
3.88
Mandy Ashton
1W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
82%18%<1%
3.87
Sarah Teves
13W–3L career · 9 lines in 2026
1%88%12%
3.83
Julie Blavier
5W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
91%9%<1%
3.81
Lana Parker
6W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
92%8%<1%
3.80

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.