Teams

FCCC RED

2023 USTA MIXED 18 & OVER - NOCO · MIXED 7.0 - 18 & OVER - NOCO

16 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-05-14vs CSU GREENLost 03
L#1 DoublesDavid Shigekane / Stephanie Kemp vs Joe Ashbee / Liz Cundall2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesNeal McConnellogue / Kim McConnellogue vs Nicholas Diel / Kristen Frisch2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesKelli Barber / Dean Barber vs Wil Buchanan / Erin Dirvonas3-6, 2-6
2023-05-07vs HMTC CRIMSONWon 21
W#1 DoublesDavid Shigekane / Stephanie Kemp vs Michael Robeson / Vicki Dean7-6, 6-4
W#2 DoublesNeal McConnellogue / Kim McConnellogue vs Anja Mau / John Dunnington6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesJames Lautzenheiser / Sandra Lautzenheiser vs Kendal Sanders / Tracy Sanders1-6, 6-7
2023-04-30vs LVTA ORANGELost 12
L#1 DoublesTahni Clay / Jon Clay vs Elisabeth Wanke / Jared Petersen6-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesKelli Barber / Dean Barber vs Dawn Petersen / Paul Akers6-2, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMelissa Conlon / Greg Lammons vs Austin Johnson / Alok Vats2-6, 6-2, 0-1
2023-04-23vs CSU GREENLost 03
L#1 DoublesAmy Anderson / Dan Anderson vs James DuPriest / Andrea Flake2-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesChad Preiss / Karen Preiss vs Karen Kiser / Shane Miller6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMelissa Conlon / Greg Lammons vs Wil Buchanan / Liz Cundall6-7, 2-6
2023-04-16vs HMTC CRIMSONWon 21
L#1 DoublesNeal McConnellogue / Kim McConnellogue vs Michael Robeson / Vicki Dean2-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesDan Anderson / Amy Anderson vs Kendal Sanders / Tracy Sanders6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJon Clay / Tahni Clay vs Jim Draper / Judy Stout6-1, 6-0
2023-04-02vs LVTA ORANGEWon 30
W#1 DoublesKaren Preiss / Chad Preiss vs Christina Whalen / Eric Sorensen6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesAmy Anderson / Dan Anderson vs Alok Vats / Austin Johnson6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesSandra Lautzenheiser / James Lautzenheiser vs Jared Petersen / Caitlyn Reid6-4, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MIXED 7.0 - 18 & OVER - NOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.33 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.55
David Shigekane
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.51
Stephanie Kemp
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.49
Kelli Barber
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.48
Karen Preiss
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.43
Dean Barber
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.37
Greg Lammons
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.32
Neal McConnellogue
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.31
Jon Clay
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.30
Dan Anderson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.26
Tahni Clay
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.16
Chad Preiss
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.13
Kim McConnellogue
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.04
Kaylyn Shelby
published 3.5
James Lautzenheiser
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Melissa Conlon
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Sandra Lautzenheiser
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kim McConnellogue + Neal McConnellogue2642% games−11.9% vs expected
Karen Preiss + Chad Preiss2351% gamesnot enough data
Kelli Barber + Dean Barber224 matchesnot enough data
Stephanie Kemp + David Shigekane314 matchesnot enough data
Tahni Clay + Jon Clay213 matchesnot enough data
Melissa Conlon + Greg Lammons033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
David Shigekane
69W–28L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%36%64%
3.55
Stephanie Kemp
63W–25L career · 2 lines in 2023
48%52%<1%
3.51
Kelli Barber
57W–35L career · 2 lines in 2023
54%46%<1%
3.49
3.5
Karen Preiss
116W–45L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%57%43%
3.48
3.5
Dean Barber
59W–23L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%71%29%
3.43
3.5
Greg Lammons
56W–22L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%85%15%
3.37
3.5
Neal McConnellogue
62W–55L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%91%9%
3.32
Jon Clay
20W–10L career · 2 lines in 2023
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Dan Anderson
36W–25L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Tahni Clay
99W–72L career · 2 lines in 2023
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Chad Preiss
27W–31L career · 2 lines in 2023
11%89%<1%
3.16
3.5
Kim McConnellogue
36W–67L career · 3 lines in 2023
15%85%<1%
3.13
3.5
Kaylyn Shelby
55W–58L career · no lines in 2023
37%63%<1%
3.04
James Lautzenheiser
7W–3L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Melissa Conlon
20W–18L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Sandra Lautzenheiser
7W–5L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.