Teams

CBRC-Cooley

2022 Adult 55 & Over · 7.0 WOMEN

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / EASTERN WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2021-11-06vs WRAC-NoydLost 12
W#1 DoublesEvoria Beasley / Victoria Smoot vs Darillyn Flones / Jennifer Carlson6-3, 0-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesPaula Davis-Vedder / Cheryl Cooley vs Connie Russ / Selena Hernandez6-7, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKarin Kontogianis / Val Otto vs Leslie Blair / Cynthia Noyd4-6, 1-6
2021-11-06vs IND-Tri-State Warriors WIMWon 21
W#1 DoublesVictoria Smoot / Evoria Beasley vs Sherry Varner / Terri Ruthruff7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesVal Otto / Karin Kontogianis vs Janie Slater / Lisa Marks4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesAnne Neuberger / Sandy Lepage vs Cyndie Lempesis / Karen Henderson3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2021-11-05vs SC-SteinerWon 21
W#1 DoublesEvoria Beasley / Victoria Smoot vs Marie Lambert / Voni Tombari6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesPaula Davis-Vedder / Cheryl Cooley vs Jan Smith / Shirlee Steiner4-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#3 DoublesSandy Lepage / Anne Neuberger vs Nancy Bettesworth / Cheryl Stransky6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · 7.0 WOMEN
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1YTC-Donahue2163773
2SC-Middle Skittles2163862
3CBRC-Cooley21541184
4WRAC-Woodward21541284
5IND-Tri-State Warriors WIM12451078

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.12 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.59
Val Otto
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.29
Paula Davis-Vedder
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Evoria Beasley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.19
Victoria Smoot
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.88
Anne Neuberger
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.63
Cheryl Cooley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Karin Kontogianis
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Sandy Lepage
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Paula Davis-Vedder + Cheryl Cooley1454% gamesnot enough data
Paula Davis-Vedder + Val Otto2348% gamesnot enough data
Evoria Beasley + Victoria Smoot3247% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Val Otto
33W–63L career · 5 lines in 2022
25%75%<1%
3.59
3.5
Paula Davis-Vedder
54W–61L career · 2 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.29
3.5
Evoria Beasley
14W–19L career · type S · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Victoria Smoot
70W–58L career · 3 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.19
3
Anne Neuberger
55W–34L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%82%18%
2.88
3.5
Cheryl Cooley
25W–42L career · 2 lines in 2022
>99%<1%<1%
2.63
Karin Kontogianis
11W–35L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Sandy Lepage
13W–30L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.