Teams

8-AMcneill-CCC

2023 Eno River Adult 40 & Over · 40 & Over Adult 3.0 Women-Evening

9 players · average NTRP 3.10 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-05-01vs 2-GLoFrese-EnoWon 20
W#1 DoublesLisa Montague / Nancy Sickel vs Leslie Jackson / Gretchen LoFrese6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesBeth Dingler / Terri Smith vs Kerry Espinola / Kellianne White6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2023-04-17vs 3-MTaub-CHTCWon 20
W#1 SinglesSara Lawrence vs Breah Woolson6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesNancy Sickel / Jennifer Sykes vs Amber Jarvis / Lisa Baxter7-6, 6-4
2023-04-12vs 9-AKlein/NDolan-HRWon 20
W#1 DoublesAlise McNeill / Nancy Sickel vs Cheryl Bock / Amanda Alexander Klein6-3, 6-0
W#1 SinglesSara Lawrence vs Nancy Rocamora6-0, 6-1
2023-04-10vs 10-CCarrico-HVCCWon 10
W#2 DoublesBeth Dingler / Lisa Johnson vs Kensy Ryan / Deborah Hertzog6-1, 6-4
2023-03-20vs 1-BBlanc-ElmiraWon 10
W#2 DoublesNancy Sickel / Anne Brady vs Bracha Blanc / Meredith Heath7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2023-03-13Won 10
W#3 DoublesAlise McNeill / Beth Dingler vs Katherine Knapp / Kristin Eskind6-0, 6-3
2023-03-08vs 6-KLaan-EnoLost 02
L#1 SinglesSara Lawrence vs Sarah Franks1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesBeth Dingler / Jennifer Edmunds vs Abigail Weaver / Susan Graff7-5, 2-6, 0-1
2023-03-06vs 5-TStefan-HSLost 01
L#2 DoublesMary T Long / Sara Lawrence vs Lori Sloan / Tynita Edwards6-3, 6-7, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Adult 3.0 Women-Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.95 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.63
Lisa Montague
published
3.09
Nancy Sickel
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.05
Sara Lawrence
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.98
Anne Brady
published 3
2.90
Beth Dingler
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.88
Jennifer Sykes
published
2.87
Alise McNeill
published 3
2.78
Mary T Long
published
2.39
Jennifer Edmunds
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Sykes + Anne Brady4351% games−2.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lisa Montague
25W–29L career · no lines in 2023
17%83%<1%
3.63
3.5
Nancy Sickel
62W–75L career · 4 lines in 2023
26%74%<1%
3.09
3
Sara Lawrence
160W–120L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%37%63%
3.05
3
Anne Brady
11W–6L career · no lines in 2023
<1%55%45%
2.98
3
Beth Dingler
115W–63L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%75%25%
2.90
Jennifer Sykes
6W–6L career · no lines in 2023
<1%79%21%
2.88
3
Alise McNeill
5W–9L career · no lines in 2023
<1%82%17%
2.87
Mary T Long
27W–68L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%6%
2.78
Jennifer Edmunds
9W–27L career · no lines in 2023
79%21%<1%
2.39

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.