← Teams

CRRC-Glenn

2023 Mixed 55 & Over · 7.0 Mixed

8 players · average NTRP 3.44 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.82
Nick Hooker
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.65
Steve Swan
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
—
Lawrence Cooper
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
—
Sibyl Jarrett
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.14
Ryan Owens
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.07
Robert Glenn
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
2.79
Carol Glenn
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.74
Nicola Ash
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Results9 ties
2023-05-14Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesRobert Glenn / Cori Pierce vs Kevin Semonsen / Nora Semonsen7-5, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesNick Hooker / Nicola Ash vs Kathleen Budnick / Frank Brown6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCarol Glenn / Steve Swan vs Marianne Conroy / Michael Lavios6-1, 6-3
2023-05-06Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesCori Pierce / Ryan Owens vs Robin Burak / Kevin Muck6-7, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesNicola Ash / Nick Hooker vs John Hapke / Cheryl Geisler7-5, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCarol Glenn / Daniel Cooper vs Rochelle Pluymers / Wei Pan6-1, 6-2
2023-04-29Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesRobert Glenn / Cori Pierce vs Julie Arness / Jeff Marcus6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLawrence Cooper / Sibyl Jarrett vs Michael Kardas / Cecile Bamer6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSteve Swan / Joan Randall vs Kevin Sullivan / Tuni Stecker6-4, 6-2
2023-04-23Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesNicola Ash / Nick Hooker vs Vivian Nguyen / Robert Truong6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesRobert Glenn / Carol Glenn vs Sandi Martes / Edmund Yuan6-1, 6-1
2023-04-16Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesRobert Glenn / Nicola Ash vs Jim Fisher / Paula Conway6-0, 6-4
W#2 DoublesRyan Owens / Cori Pierce vs Kevin Grainger / Kathy Ramsey6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesLawrence Cooper / Sibyl Jarrett vs Rick Davis / Marje Ferek6-4, 6-4
2023-04-08Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesNicola Ash / Nick Hooker vs Mary Lowblad / Bill Lowblad6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJoan Randall / Ryan Owens vs Gail Bolte / Matt Bolte6-3, 7-6
L#3 DoublesDaniel Cooper / Carol Glenn vs Susan Bradley / Tony Moreno7-6, 6-0
2023-04-02Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesNicola Ash / Steve Swan vs Bruce Trubo / Betty Trubo3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLawrence Cooper / Sibyl Jarrett vs Les Wellman / Mary Beth Thomsen5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRobert Glenn / Carol Glenn vs Michael Siebers / Kathy Siebers7-5, 7-5
2023-04-01Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesCarol Glenn / Robert Glenn vs Sandra Ellis / Clay Funkhouser6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJoan Randall / Steve Swan vs Brian Cormier / Ellen Mulherin6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLawrence Cooper / Sibyl Jarrett vs Jerry Garland / Cheryl Roloff6-2, 6-2
2023-03-17Lost 0–1
L#2 DoublesSibyl Jarrett / Jeff Lipke vs Lisa Hockman / David Pham6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Nick Hooker
194W–65L career
0%98%2%
3.82
3.5
Steve Swan
28W–51L career
0%42%58%
3.65
3.5
Lawrence Cooper
80W–50L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Sibyl Jarrett
36W–73L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Ryan Owens
113W–77L career
6%94%0%
3.14
3.5
Robert Glenn
117W–113L career
14%86%0%
3.07
3
Carol Glenn
82W–81L career
0%99%1%
2.79
3
Nicola Ash
114W–136L career
1%99%0%
2.74

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.