Teams

DIAMOND HILLS 18AW3.0A

2024 ADULT 18&Over · Women's 3.0

15 players · average NTRP 3.10 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-06-04vs MORAGA CC 18AW3.0ALost 01
L#3 DoublesLuisa Wahlstrom / Girlie Sison vs Andrea Hogan / Kim Krozek1-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesGirlie Sison / Luisa Wahlstrom vs Teresa Brannon / Tina Ly6-1, 6-1
2024-05-20vs RANCHO COLORADOS 18AW3.0ALost 01
L#2 DoublesLuisa Wahlstrom / Girlie Sison vs Risa Wernimont / Christine Parker4-6, 3-6
2024-05-07vs ROUND HILL CC 18AW3.0ALost 01
L#3 DoublesVeronica Gudino / Luisa Wahlstrom vs Raylinn Bianchi / Kristi Carter2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women's 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.94 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.44
Sara Bogado
published
3.03
Sue Burns
published
3.00
Marie Austero
published
2.99
Winnie Rock
published
2.95
Jeraldine Gutierrez
published
2.94
Karen Bibel
published
2.93
Girlie Sison
published
2.91
Christina Dalton
published 3.5
2.88
Anita Sparks
published 3
2.86
2.85
Luisa Wahlstrom
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.83
Jennifer Oetinger
published
2.79
Guofeng Lovett
published
Carol Toscano
published 3
2.75
Annie Pescasiosa
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marie Austero + Winnie Rock1639% games−9.4% vs expected
Sue Burns + Karen Bibel123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sara Bogado
15W–2L career · no lines in 2024
<1%66%34%
3.44
Sue Burns
25W–22L career · no lines in 2024
<1%42%58%
3.03
Marie Austero
2W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%51%49%
3.00
Winnie Rock
19W–21L career · no lines in 2024
<1%53%47%
2.99
Jeraldine Gutierrez
6W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%64%36%
2.95
Karen Bibel
11W–19L career · no lines in 2024
<1%67%33%
2.94
Girlie Sison
6W–11L career · no lines in 2024
<1%68%32%
2.93
3.5
Christina Dalton
4W–16L career · no lines in 2024
75%25%<1%
2.91
3
Anita Sparks
7W–12L career · type A · no lines in 2024
<1%81%19%
2.88
3
Alessandra Mendes
15W–8L career · no lines in 2024
<1%83%16%
2.86
Luisa Wahlstrom
59W–58L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%85%14%
2.85
Jennifer Oetinger
8W–11L career · no lines in 2024
1%87%12%
2.83
Guofeng Lovett
7W–10L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
2.79
3
Carol Toscano
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Annie Pescasiosa
3W–3L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%4%
2.75

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.