Teams

SBurke (Raintree)

2022 Combo Doubles 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Combo 5.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-10-04vs HFranc (Piper Glen)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesPaula Abrams / Suzanne MacVicar vs Stephanie Rock / Sarah Garner2-6, 3-6
2022-09-27vs MMcSherry (PCC)Won 10
W#1 DoublesPaula Abrams / Suzanne MacVicar vs Brooks Herman / Kristin Salina6-4, 6-3
2022-09-14vs AEagan (Weddington)Won 20
W#2 DoublesSuzanne MacVicar / Karen Allen vs Olivia Day / Pamela Trantham7-6, 6-3
W#3 DoublesShannon Burke / Andrea Caldini vs Jamie Zarambo / Lisa Leake7-5, 6-4
2022-09-13vs MJessee (Blakeney)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesSuzanne MacVicar / Shannon Burke vs Nickole Branch / Shanin Trivanovic3-6, 5-7
2022-09-06vs EEisenbaum (Park Road)Won 10
W#1 DoublesShannon Burke / Julie Klingman vs Sara Ash / Melissa McVey6-3, 7-6
2022-08-23vs AEllis (Jeff Adams)Split 11
L#1 DoublesHeather Toye / Suzanne MacVicar vs Abbey Ellis / Emily Rodgers7-6, 0-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJulie Klingman / Alexis Schwartz vs Allison Broemel / Jazzmin Romero6-4, 6-4
2022-08-16vs LBlack (Providence Plantation)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesJulie Klingman / Elizabeth Scoville vs Leslee Black / Nanci Weil7-5, 2-6, 0-1
2022-08-09vs EFrederick/LRogers (Foxcroft East)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesAndrea Caldini / Rebecca Plaisance vs Leigh Rogers / Haley Cheek5-7, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Combo 5.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.69 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.28
Suzanne Austin
published
2.85
Julie Klingman
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.83
Suzanne MacVicar
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 44% · published 3
2.76
Heather Toye
published 3
Chelsea Law
published 3
2.72
Andrea Caldini
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.54
Marie Foley
published
2.40
Melissa Orr
published
2.13
Rebecca Plaisance
published
Elizabeth Scoville
published
Paula Abrams
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Julie Klingman + Andrea Caldini134 matchesnot enough data
Julie Klingman + Suzanne MacVicar213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Suzanne Austin
31W–42L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.28
3
Julie Klingman
40W–32L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%87%12%
2.85
3
Suzanne MacVicar
89W–101L career · 9 lines in 2022
<1%89%10%
2.83
3
Heather Toye
8W–7L career · no lines in 2022
2%95%3%
2.76
3
Chelsea Law
4W–9L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Andrea Caldini
28W–36L career · 2 lines in 2022
5%94%1%
2.72
Marie Foley
12W–19L career · no lines in 2022
38%62%<1%
2.54
Melissa Orr
13W–18L career · no lines in 2022
78%22%<1%
2.40
Rebecca Plaisance
11W–30L career · no lines in 2022
0%>99%<1%
2.13
Elizabeth Scoville
0W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Paula Abrams
3W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.