← Teams

LOTC-Vargas/Lyman

2019 Adult 40 & Over · 4.0 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.75 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.46 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
Kristi Vargas
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #1 Singles 13% · published 4
—
Julie Hester
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.65
Kristen Fisher
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.32
Kathleen Budnick
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Singles 14% · published 3.5
—
Sarah Bradley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.10
Ann Skoog
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
—
Lisa West
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 0
Results8 ties
2019-06-30Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesJulie Hester / Kristi Vargas vs Kay Dobashi / Chizuru Watanabe6-1, 6-2
W#2 SinglesKathleen Budnick vs Sally Murdoch7-6, 6-3
L#3 DoublesKristen Fisher / Lisa West vs Robby Lafleur / Jessica Miller7-6, 6-3
2019-06-23Split 2–2
L#1 DoublesJulie Hester / Kristi Vargas vs Juan Li / Amiee Moyers6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesSherri Sacconaghi / Lisa West vs Timothea Barnatan / Jalaja Uppili6-3, 6-4
L#2 SinglesAnn Skoog vs Kristin Spear6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesPat Berends / Sarah Bradley vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2019-06-22Lost 1–3
L#1 DoublesSherri Sacconaghi / Kristi Vargas vs Misty Bettis / Nenette Olson6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesKathleen Budnick / Kristin Lyman vs Erin Hill / Katherine Kralj6-4, 6-2
W#2 SinglesAnn Skoog vs Jane Brass Barth2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLisa West / Desiree Whitehall vs Sandra Seyler / Sarah MacCarthy7-6, 6-3
2019-05-18Split 2–2
L#1 DoublesLaura Berta / Lisa West vs Terri Bashkingy / Sue Edmonds6-2, 6-4
L#1 SinglesAnn Skoog vs RENEE VANDEGRIEND6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKristi Vargas / Kristin Lyman vs Jennifer Andrieu / Denise Dawkins6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesKathleen Budnick / Heather Griffin vs Kim Hamlik / Ginny Nichols6-3, 6-2
2019-05-10Won 3–1
W#1 DoublesHeather Dudley / Lisa West vs Diana Almy / Courtney Pierce2-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKathleen Budnick / Heather Griffin vs Nina Sanna / Linda Barker6-1, 7-5
L#2 SinglesAnn Skoog vs Michele Gray4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKristin Lyman / Kristi Vargas vs Peg McClendon / Sarah Grewe6-3, 6-2
2019-05-05Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesJulie Hester / Desiree Whitehall vs Sarah MacCarthy / Sandra Seyler6-3, 7-6
L#1 SinglesKristi Vargas vs Maureen Busby3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKathleen Budnick / Kristin Lyman vs Rise Hawley / Kari Martin6-1, 6-1
2019-05-04Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesKristi Vargas / Julie Hester vs Ginny Nichols / Michelle Day-Wirth7-6, 6-2
L#1 SinglesKristen Fisher vs RENEE VANDEGRIEND3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKathleen Budnick / Sherri Sacconaghi vs Suzy Rylander / Denise Dawkins6-4, 6-3
2019-04-27Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesJulie Hester / Kristi Vargas vs Amy Jean / Marie Picard6-1, 6-2
L#1 SinglesKathleen Budnick vs Aracelia Hettle6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesHeather Dudley / Lisa West vs Joelle Lewis / Kathleen Schlickeiser4-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Kristi Vargas
82W–131L career
0%99%1%
3.78
4
Julie Hester
9W–25L career · type M
not enough data
—
4
Kristen Fisher
67W–52L career
8%92%0%
3.65
3.5
Kathleen Budnick
138W–170L career
0%98%2%
3.32
3.5
Sarah Bradley
25W–43L career · type M
not enough data
—
3.5
Ann Skoog
43W–66L career
12%88%0%
3.10
0
Lisa West
26W–44L career
not enough data
—

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.