Teams

KTC-Stecklein

2026 OH OV WINTER A18&O · 2026 Winter A18&O 2.5 Women Weekend

9 players · average NTRP 2.50 / OHIO VALLEY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule12 played
2026-05-09vs WPAFB-TrotterWon 20
W#1 DoublesKamna Gupta / Vicky Berry vs Jordan Peasant / Madison Davis6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMallory Jahn / Kelli Jameson vs Amelia Clairmont / Valerie Walker6-1, 6-3
2026-05-03vs SRTC-ForsterSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJeanna Stecklein / Kamna Gupta vs Krista Mitchell / Melanie Edwards6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesMallory Jahn / Muna Jneidi vs Hanna Hulbert / Jane Woodford2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2026-04-19Won 20
W#1 DoublesJana Kwik / Kamna Gupta vs Tara Viney / Lee Anne Drapalik6-1, 6-0
W#1 SinglesVicky Berry vs Kristin Nielsen4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-04-11vs STC-WoodwardWon 20
W#1 DoublesJana Kwik / Vicky Berry vs Deanna Lewis / Valarie O'Connell6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJeanna Stecklein / Mallory Jahn vs Carrie Melton / Eileen Schulze6-1, 6-3
2026-03-27vs QRRC-MartinWon 21
W#1 DoublesMuna Jneidi / Jana Kwik vs Jennifer Martin / Stacie Meyer6-1, 6-1
W#1 SinglesJeanna Stecklein vs Xindi Li6-0, 7-5
L#2 DoublesMary Timm / Andrea Waugh vs Daniele Sofer / Elom Dossa4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-03-22vs QRRC-PattonWon 21
W#1 DoublesKamna Gupta / Jana Kwik vs Brianna Babienco / Evgenia Antimonova6-2, 7-6
W#1 SinglesJeanna Stecklein vs Lisa Patton6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesMuna Jneidi / Vicky Berry vs Britni Biggers / Sarah Oliver2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2026-03-08vs WPAFB-TrotterWon 30
W#1 DoublesKamna Gupta / Jana Kwik vs Carol Bowling / Julie Trotter6-0, 6-2
W#1 SinglesJeanna Stecklein vs Annette Hanf6-1, 7-6
W#2 DoublesVicky Berry / Mallory Jahn vs Melissa R Green / Amelia Clairmont6-0, 6-1
2026-02-28Won 30
W#1 DoublesVicky Berry / Jenna Coy vs Zahra Kamdideh / Larissa Hoban7-5, 6-4
W#1 SinglesKamna Gupta vs Kristin Nielsen6-2, 7-5
W#2 DoublesMary Timm / Mallory Jahn vs Arlene Esche / Tara Viney6-2, 2-6, 1-0
2026-02-22vs QRRC-MartinWon 21
W#1 DoublesJenna Coy / Muna Jneidi vs Cheryl Silcox / Jennifer Martin6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesJeanna Stecklein vs Roxana Aguirre6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesHolly Sbrocchi / Kelli Jameson vs Debra Fazio / Daniele Sofer2-6, 5-7
2026-02-14vs STC-WoodwardWon 20
W#1 DoublesKamna Gupta / Jana Kwik vs Asja Kalnins / Carrie Melton6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMary Timm / Andrea Waugh vs Pam Stewart / Irene Vanderstar7-6, 7-6
2026-01-31vs QRRC-PattonWon 21
W#1 DoublesJana Kwik / Kamna Gupta vs Gwyn King / Jennifer MacK6-2, 7-5
W#1 SinglesJeanna Stecklein vs Sara Murrell6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesVicky Berry / Andrea Waugh vs Andrea Bublitz / Brianna Babienco4-6, 3-6
2026-01-17vs SRTC-ForsterWon 21
L#1 DoublesJana Kwik / Vicky Berry vs Krista Mitchell / Melanie Edwards2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#1 SinglesKamna Gupta vs Anaeli Toro6-1, 7-6
W#2 DoublesMary Timm / Mallory Jahn vs Jane Woodford / Maureen Murphy6-3, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2026 Winter A18&O 2.5 Women Weekend have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.32 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.62
Jeanna Stecklein
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Doubles 8% · published
2.55
Jana Kwik
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.37
Kamna Gupta
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #1 Singles 21% · published
2.29
Muna Jneidi
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.26
Mary Timm
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.24
Andrea Waugh
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 2.5
2.23
Vicky Berry
usually #2 Doubles 46%, also #1 Doubles 31% · published
1.98
Holly Sbrocchi
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Kelli Jameson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kamna Gupta + Jana Kwik6170% gamesnot enough data
Holly Sbrocchi + Jana Kwik224 matchesnot enough data
Holly Sbrocchi + Kamna Gupta213 matchesnot enough data
Holly Sbrocchi + Vicky Berry033 matchesnot enough data
Muna Jneidi + Mary Timm123 matchesnot enough data
Kamna Gupta + Vicky Berry123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jeanna Stecklein
40W–26L career · 12 lines in 2026
0%19%81%
2.62
Jana Kwik
20W–6L career · 8 lines in 2026
0%35%65%
2.55
Kamna Gupta
24W–37L career · 14 lines in 2026
0%82%18%
2.37
Muna Jneidi
18W–32L career · 9 lines in 2026
0%93%7%
2.29
2.5
Mary Timm
15W–30L career · 9 lines in 2026
0%95%5%
2.26
2.5
Andrea Waugh
11W–24L career · 10 lines in 2026
0%97%3%
2.24
Vicky Berry
10W–18L career · 12 lines in 2026
0%97%3%
2.23
Holly Sbrocchi
10W–20L career · 1 line in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.98
Kelli Jameson
2W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.